Aggressively Hiring - Senior Project Engineer L3Harris Employee Review

5.0
Feb 11, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

In the early days of the pandemic when many activities were shutting down, the L3Harris hiring manager and HR representative went out of their way to line me up with multiple virtual interviews, for multiple openings. They kept me well informed in the process steps after the interviews and were quick in the hiring decision and offer. After coming on-board, employee health and safety has been emphasized as a top priority, and as a result, they are very encouraging and accommodating to allow work-from home as much as possible. My onboarding experience was very well organized, and I am very happy that I had the opportunity and made the right decision to join this great team.

Cons

A bittersweet con for L3Harris is that they are so successful in keeping the confidence of the US military, that business is great and the work load is growing slightly faster than the workforce

avatar
L3Harris Response
5y
Thank you so much for leaving a review! We're glad you had such an amazing onboarding experience. As you know, the industry is growing rapidly, so we must remain agile to support the mission-critical solutions that our customers depend on us to deliver. We hope you take advantage of some of our benefits to maintain work/life integration, such as our discretionary PTO to refresh so you can continue to bring your best self to work!

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Cons

They doesn't allow remote work

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All