Great place to work - Senior Trade Compliance Specialist L3Harris Employee Review

5.0
Mar 3, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Inclusion. L3 Harris works daily to make sure that men and women alike are treated equally and with the utmost respect. Work-Life balance is not only talked about but encouraged. Flexibility is fantastic. Continuous Training is offered as well as opportunity to earn another degree if desired. Company is profitable which is always a plus because this extends to good benefits and funds to employ enough people to do the work.

Cons

I have not experienced anything that would be considered a "con" - I have no regrets to making the transition to L3Harris.

avatar
L3Harris Response
5y
Thanks for your review! We're glad you are happy are contributing to our workplace culture and able to bring your best self to work.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Cons

They doesn't allow remote work

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All