L3Harris ForceX: Just another one. - Quality Engineer L3Harris Employee Review

2.0
Oct 13, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some nice-to-have perks that won't meaningfully improve your experience. Pay isn't terrible (but it's stagnant).

Cons

You'll be pigeon-holed into a dead-end role and completely ignored for the entirety of your time there. Uses all the textbook corporate lines about "family" and "culture" and how great everything is going, and predictably uses all the textbook corporate lines when they refuse to issue promotions or raises or career opportunities. Brags about profits, but never offers bonuses. Boasts about culture, but can't keep anyone on longer than a year or two. They really think they're special here, but they're just one more "productivity" mill in an overcrowded city.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Jul 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Passionate people - Lots of work - Open to new implementation

Cons

- Ladder climb is a bit unstructured.

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All