About to Outsource All Employees - Yet Management Travels by Private Jets - Anonymous employee LPL Financial Employee Review

2.0
Jan 7, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It's a paycheck for now

Cons

LPL Financial is at best a second rate financial services firm. They will always be behind Fidelity, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Goldman and others. Always - and they act like it. CEO, Mark Casady, still expects his top tier management staff to attend marketing and other such conferences multiple times per year - this kind of thinking is from someone who hasn't realized that THAT IS NOT WHAT GREAT FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANIES DO. Companies that are still trying to make a name for themselves, that are still climbing the financial services ladder do. This is one of the problems - Senior Management is still stuck in the past. Right at this very minute upper management are engaged in a meeting to discuss the imminent outsourcing of all employees - this is what they call their "successful" transition of everyone below AVP to being contractors. They're getting rid of all of their staff. Does a great company do that? I for one have been a loyal, hardworking employee and have put up with a lot of ridiculous ego and dysfunction from upper management. The very people who are determining that my livelihood is secondary are trying to pass off their money making decision to outsource as a "great and long term career move" for us staff members. Really? A lower salary and higher health insurance premiums and much higher health insurance deductibles are a better way for us to live? Delusional much? I know I'm not alone when I say that as soon as that message gets passed officially onto the employees I am out LPL Financial. Goodbye.

Explore other reviews about LPL Financial

5.0
May 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture and work life balance

Cons

Pay for area of living on lower side

2.0
May 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

LPL Financial offers a flexible hybrid work model, which is one of the better aspects of the company. Managers are generally not overly strict about specific in-office days, giving employees some flexibility in managing their schedules.

Cons

Work-life balance is a major challenge. Weekend release work is common, often averaging two weekends per month, yet there is no overtime compensation. Employees are essentially expected to work a full workweek plus weekends when needed, which has contributed to high turnover on some teams. The culture can also feel harsh and impersonal. Leadership rarely expresses appreciation or recognition for employee contributions, which negatively impacts morale. Some managers come across as cold or overly task-focused, creating an environment where employees feel valued only for output rather than as people. There also appears to be a lack of trust between employees and leadership. Many teammates do not seem confident that leadership understands or genuinely addresses their concerns. Overall, morale feels low, and recognition for strong performance appears limited.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All