Lots of ups, lots of downs. Company in turmoil. - Engineering Development Labsphere Employee Review

1.0
Dec 16, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Labsphere is a combination of a manufacturing company, making photonics test equipment, and an engineering company that creates software to run their equipment, and mechanical and electrical modifications to their core test equipment. The core equipment is called an integrating sphere and is used either to characterize light or to generate a uniform light source to help calibrate devices, such as cameras. Many of the rank and file folks who work at Labsphere are dedicated and hard-working.

Cons

Labsphere has made some well-intentioned efforts to foster innovation. However, a string of poor choices for senior management has roiled the engineering corps, decimating the ranks, especially of young and innovative contributors. Labsphere is in a beautiful spot in New Hampshire, but it's hard to attract young engineering talent. Over the last several years, they have had some superb folks, but they have moved on. These kinds of people are hard to replace.

Explore other reviews about Labsphere

5.0
Jan 2, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I spent three years early in my career at Labsphere, and it was an incredible learning experience. The management team, particularly the production manager, was exceptionally patient and supportive. They provided me with all the tools and guidance I needed to grow and succeed. The mentorship I received was truly one of the most memorable and impactful moments of my professional journey.

Cons

I do not have any cons .

2.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The best part of my experience was the people I worked with. I gained a lot of valuable technical experience by working on a variety of projects and collaborating with different teams. The flexible work schedule, employee events, breakfast gatherings, and ability to make the workspace feel personal helped create a positive culture. Working across departments also pushed me to become a stronger communicator and a more well-rounded engineer.

Cons

There wasn't much room for career growth, and there wasn't a clear promotion structure or engineering levels to work toward. Training was hit or miss, so a lot of learning happened through trial and error. I would have liked more regular feedback from management and clearer expectations about my performance and career development. I also think offering a more flexible WFH policy, improving efforts around diversity and inclusion, and focusing on retaining younger employees would go a long way. Compensation also didn't seem to match the responsibilities of the role, especially as those responsibilities grew over time.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All