employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Liberty Science Center

Is this your company?

Negative Experience - Hospitality Associate Liberty Science Center Employee Review

2.0
Jun 30, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Somewhat flexible scheduling, very basic tasks that require pretty standard social skills. Makes it easy to stay in school and juggle multiple commitments. You don't need to have a field of study in science to work here.

Cons

A lot of caring people in admin either left or moved on, and the gaps left were filled with people who have zero compassion or empathy for the associates who work the floors. Often managers (we call them coordinators) side with rude and downright offensive guests. They often walk around the exhibits and micromanage to the point where the environment is so hostile and toxic, the anxiety and stress bled into my personal and school life. HR was very unhelpful with several of the issues I had at Liberty Science Center, and often a lot of what was said in HR was not kept 100% confidential. If you can put up with abusive guests and uncaring managers, it's a pretty steady job, though the pay isn't very impressive. The entire place is run down, extremely unprofessional, and not educational in the sciences at all.

Explore other reviews about Liberty Science Center

5.0
Oct 26, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great pay for a summer job, great coworkers

Cons

Dont have much to say

2.0
May 1, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Proximity to NYC and having ASTC membership for free tickets at other museums was great.

Cons

Extremely toxic work environment. The head of HR is a well-known insane person who targets people she doesn't like, or if you request any sort of accommodation. Management overall is unwilling to work with employees who do not fit their ideal mold, but claim to be inclusive. For example, in an industry that often attracts neurodiverse workers, they are appalled at the idea of wanting lowered lights in the office, at allowing work-from-home, or accepting that others might have different ways of communicating and interacting with others. "Optional" social lunches or gatherings are thrown back at employees in their quarterly reviews if not attended, claiming that you are not invested as a team member. On a similar note, employees are not at all valued by management. Guest ambassadors are infantilized and micromanaged, with a yearly purge happening at the end of spring where ambassadors are fired over things like clocking in 2 minutes late or taking out a phone to check the time. In other departments, there is zero upward mobility and a high turnover rate-- the manager and director of STEM Education, for example, both openly admitting this and saying if they can keep people for 3-5 years, that's all they can hope for. Burnout happens incredibly fast under these circumstances. The only people who do seem to be able to stay for beyond that time are those who are a department of one, or who simply fail upward by never advocating for themselves or their teams. Overall, employees are completely overworked, and over time will have more and more responsibility heaped on them with less and less support or reward. Despite desperately needing a union for this and other reasons, employees are terrified to attempt organization because the know that when last it was even mentioned, all those employees were purged from their jobs.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All