employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Part of MIT

Engaged Employer

Government job: slow-moving, great benefits, reasonable hours, hard to get fired - Associate Technical Staff MIT Lincoln Laboratory Employee Review

3.0
Jan 28, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People are intelligent; well-funded place to do research; some flexibility at the staff level to pursue your own projects. Good place to retire or raise a family.

Cons

The lab doesn't focus much on management, and as a consequence, the management quality is pretty patchy. There are so many possible pitfalls when doing research--one can attack uninteresting questions, or fail to have a clear question to answer, or fail to design the experiment in a way that will answer the question. Further, research is slow, and requires patience at the right moments and tenacity at others. I've never been on a project at Lincoln that was successful, and it was always a management problem. I don't want to knock Lincoln too hard, as these are common problems with research: without clear market feedback, it's really easy to end up in the weeds. But for whatever reason, we spent a lot of time in the weeds. Note that the lab is a BIG place, and this was just my experience in division 8. I would say that it is likely to be completely irrelevant to your experience in other divisions. Also, there is no such thing as job mobility for assistant or associate staff, at least in division 8. This is a place run by PhDs for PhDs. If you don't have one, you just do what you're told. That's not the worst thing in the world, but it might not be ideal for someone young and ambitious.

avatar
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Response
12y
It is clear that you have given some thought to your insights and that is appreciated. It is an accurate observation that the Laboratory is not market driven. With no profit motive or shareholders to satisfy, we can pursue technical depth that is often not feasible in industry. I am sure that at times that can feel like "being in the weeds" but it also the case that sometimes it is necessary to be very detailed when the outcome of the research can have major impact. As you have noted, this is a big place so we are able to offer both depth and breadth that is unique. A PhD is often desirable but is not required to succeed here. Annually, we hire about evenly at BS, MS and PhD levels. There is a lot of support to help people progress but it is also intentionally a flat organization. The benefit to this is that there are fewer tiers to deal with. As you have noted, intelligent people and well funded work can provide good opportunities.

Explore other reviews about MIT Lincoln Laboratory

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It can vary a lot from group to group, but in general, wonderful place with wonderful people and lots of interesting work going on. Excellent benefits and lots of flexibility to explore different projects.

Cons

Little opportunity for advancement in terms of rank and compensation once you reach technical staff. Additionally (again varies from group to group) expectations of what a staff member does can be unclear and there can be a light sink-or-swim nature to the work, again depending on the group you're in.

4.0
May 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Historically a very stable job, interesting work, great people

Cons

There can be a lack of mentorship for people early in their careers, although your experience will depend heavily on which group you are in. There are only 3 main levels of engineer with very limited group leader positions, making upward mobility limited.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All