Systems Analyst - Anonymous employee MIT Lincoln Laboratory Employee Review
3.0
Jan 10, 2016
Anonymous employee
Current employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook
Pros
-Most positions have great work/life balance
-Tuition reimbursement
-Fixed pension plan
Cons
-Culture changes are necessary to adapt to the incoming, younger workforce
-Employment in technical divisions is more highly regarded than the positions in the service departments
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Response
10y
Thank you for your insights. We have a strong focus on work life balance and are pleased that you have seen that to be the case. As an engineering and science organization it is somewhat natural that those fields are more prevalent. Nonetheless, we value the contributions of all and recognize that the total mission depends on every role being valued. We do review compensation regularly and will continue to adjust as anomalies come up. Thanks again.
Explore other reviews about MIT Lincoln Laboratory
It can vary a lot from group to group, but in general, wonderful place with wonderful people and lots of interesting work going on. Excellent benefits and lots of flexibility to explore different projects.
Cons
Little opportunity for advancement in terms of rank and compensation once you reach technical staff. Additionally (again varies from group to group) expectations of what a staff member does can be unclear and there can be a light sink-or-swim nature to the work, again depending on the group you're in.
Worked with some of the smartest people I’ve ever known.
Great opportunities to learn from your coworkers and an atmosphere that encourages learning, including a well-run technical education program.
Fabulous support staff and technicians that can get seemingly impossible things done quickly.
Great resources and lab spaces (if a bit dated).
The nature of the work encourages good work/life balance.
Fantastic benefits (though the pay is low).
Cons
No/limited opportunities for advancement makes this a hard place to work mid-career.
Good engineers are promoted to be mediocre managers.
Every program is under-funded, under-staffed, and over schedule.
Bad managers are shuffled around but rarely fired.