proud to be in Mastercard but eventually culture is spoiling - Software Engineer II Mastercard Employee Review

4.0
Oct 22, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

lotttt of leaves, 22 Indian annual leave, 6 sick , 6 casual and other festive and national holidays are apart from this. proud feeling of working with such a big brand. office building is nice. talented people in the team. people are so much dedicated to work. learning is good.

Cons

too mush politics, favoritism game in management. promotions are very slow. from 2023 annual hike become single digit. 3 days work from office, office entry is being track very strictly by manager and HR through attendance portal. most of the teams are too much into work that they dont even celebrate small occasions like ethnic days, team bonding activity is no more exist. only work work work. Vendors employees in the team having less work load than own mastercard employees. if you are fun loving person then mastercard work culture is boring for most of the team. too must work load. no work like balance. travell to office , work for almost 12 hrs a day.. even though lot of leaves are there , no work like balance left in mastercard.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
Jul 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work with smart people culture is amazing

Cons

Org is large - need lots of meetings to get action

4.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All