Great vision but hampered by difficult to implement products and poor first-line managers - Consultant McKesson Employee Review

3.0
Mar 10, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Senior executives have laid out an excellent vision and to a large extent have provided the tools necessary to make things work. They have provided the workforce with great benefits that encourage good health and a work-life balance. Majority of co-workers are hard working, intelligent, quality folks who are dedicated to improving McKesson's Health-System IT products and to doing what is right for their customers.

Cons

As a group, first-line and middle managers have exceedingly poor planning, people and social skills. They often pull people from important initiatives to do work they should have been doing themselves. THe result is that the quality of work provided to customers during implementations and consulting projects diminishes. Some first-line managers have made a career out of covering up their own planning deficiencies and poor managerial skills, sending many dedicated staff running for the exits. A number of excellent implementation consultants and clinical consultants are now doing the same work for the same McKesson customers with third party consulting firms that pay better, provide better benefits and now have a better reputation among customers than McKesson.

Explore other reviews about McKesson

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible schedule Good leadership Supportive team

Cons

Hard to move up Customers can be difficult

1.0
Jun 3, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

Cons

1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

1
avatar
McKesson Response
3w
Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All