Fantastic culture and collaborative team building with management that truly cares about employee growth. - Anonymous employee Medical Guardian Employee Review

5.0
Apr 15, 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Medical Guardian is built around a brand and a CEO who care more about saving customers lives than benefiting their own. Employees are inspired by this and bring 100% effort every day to make sure this notion is spoken throughout their actions. While sales and marketing teams in any company rarely speak the same language, MG's team atmosphere creates a collaborative, mutual understanding of a company goal and the obstacles that must be overcome in order to accomplish those goals. Small startup feel of the company allows for immense personal growth and understanding of business operations. Bagel Fridays, birthday celebrations and seasonal pot locks show the character of MG's employees and personal devotion of its leaders.

Cons

There aren't as many holiday breaks when compared to that of an Agency, which leads to the use of vacation days to get the extra time off. Besides this minute fact, MG is a fantastic place to work.

Explore other reviews about Medical Guardian

5.0
Jul 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pros of the job is that we're not a 24 hour operation the company provides equipment also management is very attentive and there for you if you need any help

Cons

Cons having to cancel services for a deceased customer its tough on the family member especially having to pay for the return of equipment

1.0
Jul 17, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There used to be a lot. Then it changed.

Cons

Unfortunately, my experience was that the internal culture often overshadowed the mission. Success frequently felt dependent on changing priorities and leadership expectations rather than consistent performance. Goals and direction could shift quickly, making it difficult to know exactly how success would be measured over the long term. Constructive coaching often took a back seat to performance management, leaving employees feeling like they were reacting instead of growing. Collaboration between departments wasn’t always as strong as it needed to be, and communication from leadership could be inconsistent. Employees were expected to adapt quickly, but there wasn’t always the same level of transparency about why decisions were being made. One of the most disappointing aspects of my experience was that long-term contributions and institutional knowledge didn’t always seem to carry much weight. It sometimes felt like results were evaluated in short windows rather than considering the broader value employees had created over time.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All