Too few resources on projects and stingy travel policy - Principal Engineer Medtronic Employee Review

3.0
Mar 31, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great pay, great benefits, satisfying work

Cons

Too few people that do my job on the project. Resources get spread VERY thin. Their it integration and support sucks. HR only quotes the policy manual and doesn't really support employees. Finally, their travel policy sucks - you have per meal limits, but if you spend less on one, you can't use that to balance against another meal - and no market adjustment. Same limits in NYC as in Dubuque...and no adjusting for currency internationally. They also don't allow business class for anybody but the executives. Even on 10+ hour flights. at least as Covidien we could do that. Travel policy was one of the few intangibles that made it worthwhile. especially since now we have to burn our vacation time over the Christmas holiday or go unpaid at the end of the year because they "close shop." Yeah, merry ducking Christmas there... T Honestly can't recommend people sign up until they fix some of the beefs. Still, you could do worse... A LOT worse, so maybe I'm just nitpicking...

Explore other reviews about Medtronic

5.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong business impact You often help maintain or improve systems tied to quality, compliance, and product reliability. That can make the work meaningful and visible. Cross-functional exposure The role usually interacts with Quality, IT, Regulatory, Manufacturing, and sometimes R&D. That can build a broad network and good business understanding. Specialized, marketable skill set Experience with quality systems, validation, documentation, audits, and regulated applications can be valuable, especially in medtech, pharma, and other regulated industries. Good mix of technical and process work If you like solving system issues but also improving workflows and controls, this role can be a strong fit. Career mobility It can lead into areas such as: Quality systems management Validation or CSV Regulatory systems Business systems analysis Program or product ownership Compliance leadership

Cons

Heavy documentation burden A lot of the work may involve change control, validation records, SOP alignment, traceability, and audit readiness. That can feel slow or administrative. High compliance pressure Mistakes in quality applications can have significant downstream effects. The role often carries risk sensitivity and scrutiny. Slower pace of change In regulated environments, even simple updates may require formal review, testing, approval, and training. That can be frustrating if you prefer fast execution. Competing priorities You may have to balance user requests, system issues, compliance needs, and audit deadlines at the same time. Limited creativity in some environments Depending on the team, the role may be more about control, stability, and process discipline than innovation.

3.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Generous, old-school benefits. Almost twice the PTO as other places I've worked, excellent healthcare, 401K matching, etc. Many high-quality colleagues and a generally mellow, polite business culture.

Cons

Multiple competing bureaucracies, internal consultancies, a computer-illiterate 'stakeholder' class with permission to disrupt anything, and perverse incentives driving waste.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All