Less technical more functional job - Data Scientist MetLife Employee Review

3.0
Jul 9, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) Good place to leverage your consulting skills 2) Good for someone who wants to work for longer periods (years) provided you don't have much expectations in terms of technical and financial growth

Cons

1) Global Analytics Research Center, MetLife, Hyderabad is not even close to a research center. Please don't get misled by the name of the center. It is just a supporting team setup here in Hyderabad 2) Center doesn't need real data scientists, they just need someone who is good at data retrieval , reporting , visualization skills and basics of data science and engineering. If you are someone with advanced knowledge of data science and constantly adapting yourself towards best practices in the industry, it is just waste of your technical stack and valuable time if you join this team 3) Senior and lead level data science employees are overrated. Don't expect technical mentorship from your technical leads because they are hardly technical 4) Unnecessary calls and meetings, redundant status update calls, bossy culture 5) Center doesn't have a product based work culture. You don't feel like you are working for one of the top insurance companies in USA because GARC center is not so concerned about ideation and innovation and more concerned about consulting, supporting 6) Perks are not good, hikes are just average

Explore other reviews about MetLife

5.0
Jul 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits are fantastic Room to grow

Cons

Back ro back calls Hard on mental health

1.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I loved my job and my coworkers, and the company's health benefits were outstanding. Leaving wasn't an easy decision, but it was the right one.

Cons

I had a toxic manager who micromanaged everything—checking time reports, tracking lunch breaks, and monitoring every minute away from your desk. They often sent multiple emails to communicate a single point because they struggled to communicate clearly. High-visibility projects were consistently given to favorites, while the rest of the team was overlooked. They were also frequently condescending in team huddles and meetings. Based on my experience, they were never taught how to lead people effectively, and I'm genuinely surprised they're still in a management role.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All