employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Modernizing Medicine

Engaged Employer

Great company but the work/life balance is deteriorating - Marketing Modernizing Medicine Employee Review

2.0
Oct 12, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The CEO & Co-founders care about employees & want to make a difference On the surface, great benefits Overall people are very helpful

Cons

Recently it's been all about more, more, more - more demanding, more results, more effort despite already being overwhelmed with current workload. They are losing GREAT people due to being expected to perform under unrealistic expectations. Little care into what a realistic workload is for one person or one department Refuse to say no to anyone - doesn't care what it costs, it will get done Management only wants to be surrounded by people who won't push back

Explore other reviews about Modernizing Medicine

5.0
Jul 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work schedule, work from home, catered lunch, friendly environment

Cons

The job intself is difficult

1.0
May 12, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The strongest aspect of the company is the resilience and talent of many of its individual contributors. I worked with smart, creative people who consistently found ways to keep critical functions operating despite significant operational and resource constraints. The environment offered extensive hands-on experience with complex systems, cross-functional dependencies, and high-volume operational problem solving. Employees often gained rapid professional growth simply because they were required to manage responsibilities well beyond the scope of their formal roles.

Cons

The company’s operational philosophy often seemed to confuse endurance with effectiveness. Employees were expected to absorb expanding responsibilities indefinitely, even when workloads had clearly exceeded sustainable limits. In some cases, entire operational domains were effectively owned by a single individual with little redundancy, limited support, and no realistic contingency planning. Leadership frequently discussed innovation and growth while failing to address basic organizational health issues such as staffing adequacy, process ownership, and burnout prevention. Months of excessive workload and escalating pressure resulted in predictable employee exhaustion, yet meaningful intervention from management or HR never materialized. There was also a noticeable tendency to treat systemic operational failures as isolated employee challenges instead of acknowledging broader leadership and resourcing problems. This created an environment where highly capable people spent more time compensating for organizational instability than performing strategic work.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All