employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Modernizing Medicine

Engaged Employer

It's Changed - Anonymous employee Modernizing Medicine Employee Review

4.0
Jul 27, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent benefits (PTO, 401k, Insurance, etc). Lunch twice a week. Cool swag gifts, like coffee mugs and towels. Petty stuff, mostly.

Cons

Overworked , understaffed and underpaid. Feels like I can never take PTO because taking a day off is the same as missing a month. They hire management from the outside, not internally (thanks Joe Harpaz). Losing the start up culture that made it attractive to begin with. The only department that ever gets a shout out is the Sales team. This used to be a fun company, that listened to its employees, had excellent room for growth, and felt like sky was the limit. Now, its turning into a rigid, corporate structure that only cares about KPIs. They want twice the work while having half the staff to do it with. Upper management does not care how it gets done, you just need to do it -- yesterday. The problem is, their solution is all this is to send you a company branded lunchbox and a coffee mug every couple of months and hope that you forget about how little work life balance you have. The CEO is a nice guy, but he is so far removed from how bad it is working in the weeds that his sweet words fall short of reality. I'm sorry Dan Cane, I know your heart is in the right place, but you are no longer running this ship. This is Joe's company now and the only thing that matters now is the bottom line. Employee morale be damned. But here, enjoy this purple towel.

Explore other reviews about Modernizing Medicine

1.0
May 12, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The strongest aspect of the company is the resilience and talent of many of its individual contributors. I worked with smart, creative people who consistently found ways to keep critical functions operating despite significant operational and resource constraints. The environment offered extensive hands-on experience with complex systems, cross-functional dependencies, and high-volume operational problem solving. Employees often gained rapid professional growth simply because they were required to manage responsibilities well beyond the scope of their formal roles.

Cons

The company’s operational philosophy often seemed to confuse endurance with effectiveness. Employees were expected to absorb expanding responsibilities indefinitely, even when workloads had clearly exceeded sustainable limits. In some cases, entire operational domains were effectively owned by a single individual with little redundancy, limited support, and no realistic contingency planning. Leadership frequently discussed innovation and growth while failing to address basic organizational health issues such as staffing adequacy, process ownership, and burnout prevention. Months of excessive workload and escalating pressure resulted in predictable employee exhaustion, yet meaningful intervention from management or HR never materialized. There was also a noticeable tendency to treat systemic operational failures as isolated employee challenges instead of acknowledging broader leadership and resourcing problems. This created an environment where highly capable people spent more time compensating for organizational instability than performing strategic work.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All