employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Modernizing Medicine

Engaged Employer

Focused only on rewards and press mentions. - Anonymous employee Modernizing Medicine Employee Review

1.0
Jan 23, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They have been nominated for and received a lot of rewards. They give free food 3 days a week. Free beverages daily.

Cons

Most employees are treated second rate. They have their favorite employees. The rest of the employees are ignored, not even a hello from leadership when they see you. Employees who ask for help or additional training are refused. Raises and bonuses are minimal, if you get them at all. There is no guarantee that the you will receive a raise. There is no opportunity for advancement at the company. Matter of fact, they move you lateral. And recently they have demoted hard working people. The product has frequent releases and is low quality. They are focused on new features to sell instead of listening to the clients who are asking for bug fixes.

Explore other reviews about Modernizing Medicine

1.0
May 12, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The strongest aspect of the company is the resilience and talent of many of its individual contributors. I worked with smart, creative people who consistently found ways to keep critical functions operating despite significant operational and resource constraints. The environment offered extensive hands-on experience with complex systems, cross-functional dependencies, and high-volume operational problem solving. Employees often gained rapid professional growth simply because they were required to manage responsibilities well beyond the scope of their formal roles.

Cons

The company’s operational philosophy often seemed to confuse endurance with effectiveness. Employees were expected to absorb expanding responsibilities indefinitely, even when workloads had clearly exceeded sustainable limits. In some cases, entire operational domains were effectively owned by a single individual with little redundancy, limited support, and no realistic contingency planning. Leadership frequently discussed innovation and growth while failing to address basic organizational health issues such as staffing adequacy, process ownership, and burnout prevention. Months of excessive workload and escalating pressure resulted in predictable employee exhaustion, yet meaningful intervention from management or HR never materialized. There was also a noticeable tendency to treat systemic operational failures as isolated employee challenges instead of acknowledging broader leadership and resourcing problems. This created an environment where highly capable people spent more time compensating for organizational instability than performing strategic work.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All