employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Modernizing Medicine

Engaged Employer

Cannot trust anyone. Gossip is widespread among leaders. - Anonymous employee Modernizing Medicine Employee Review

1.0
Jan 23, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They offer lunch 2 times a week and bagels on Friday mornings. The offer pretty good health insurance. The pay is average. There are a lot of hard workers here who are trying hard.

Cons

Do not mention to anyone if you have an illness or disability. It is held against you. They do not accommodate disabilities, and if you ask, you are questioned. There isn't even handicap parking spaces for employees or guests. If you have an issue and bring it up to HR or your boss, they do not keep it secret. They also let all other executives and bosses know of your issues or problems or shortfalls, even when it is none of their business. It is held against you. You are treated differently. You are an outcast. Probably the reason you cannot trust most on the management level is because most came from another company together. They stick together and only help each other. Modernizing Medicine is the new Campus.

Explore other reviews about Modernizing Medicine

1.0
May 12, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The strongest aspect of the company is the resilience and talent of many of its individual contributors. I worked with smart, creative people who consistently found ways to keep critical functions operating despite significant operational and resource constraints. The environment offered extensive hands-on experience with complex systems, cross-functional dependencies, and high-volume operational problem solving. Employees often gained rapid professional growth simply because they were required to manage responsibilities well beyond the scope of their formal roles.

Cons

The company’s operational philosophy often seemed to confuse endurance with effectiveness. Employees were expected to absorb expanding responsibilities indefinitely, even when workloads had clearly exceeded sustainable limits. In some cases, entire operational domains were effectively owned by a single individual with little redundancy, limited support, and no realistic contingency planning. Leadership frequently discussed innovation and growth while failing to address basic organizational health issues such as staffing adequacy, process ownership, and burnout prevention. Months of excessive workload and escalating pressure resulted in predictable employee exhaustion, yet meaningful intervention from management or HR never materialized. There was also a noticeable tendency to treat systemic operational failures as isolated employee challenges instead of acknowledging broader leadership and resourcing problems. This created an environment where highly capable people spent more time compensating for organizational instability than performing strategic work.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All