employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Modernizing Medicine

Engaged Employer

Glorified call center. A lot of work for not a lot of pay. - Software Support Specialist Modernizing Medicine Employee Review

1.0
Jan 13, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice workspace, team setting, free lunches. Fast-paced environment.

Cons

This place is a glorified call center. You speak on the phone with angry doctors and nurse practitioners all day. After each call, you have about a minute to look over your case notes or resolve the customer's issue or whatever you need to do before the next call comes in. And you have to take a minimum amount of calls (around 30) per day. You will be constantly multitasking, which is good if you like to keep busy, but it is an extremely fast pace. You also have very little autonomy here. Management's approval is needed for everything. The pay is minimum wage. Management likes remind you of how lucky you are to work there, and will constantly brag about how nice their amenities are (relaxation room, treadmills, catered lunches, snacks--keep it, I'd rather be paid more). This was a huge red flag for me. Their EHR is very complex and training is almost zero. You will have a couple of days of onboarding then you start taking calls. And for the first few months you will not have enough familiarity with EMA to solve most issues by yourself, so you have to ask literally everyone around you for help on every call you take. Only work there if you need work ASAP, then find a better job and leave.

Explore other reviews about Modernizing Medicine

5.0
Jul 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work schedule, work from home, catered lunch, friendly environment

Cons

The job intself is difficult

1.0
May 12, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The strongest aspect of the company is the resilience and talent of many of its individual contributors. I worked with smart, creative people who consistently found ways to keep critical functions operating despite significant operational and resource constraints. The environment offered extensive hands-on experience with complex systems, cross-functional dependencies, and high-volume operational problem solving. Employees often gained rapid professional growth simply because they were required to manage responsibilities well beyond the scope of their formal roles.

Cons

The company’s operational philosophy often seemed to confuse endurance with effectiveness. Employees were expected to absorb expanding responsibilities indefinitely, even when workloads had clearly exceeded sustainable limits. In some cases, entire operational domains were effectively owned by a single individual with little redundancy, limited support, and no realistic contingency planning. Leadership frequently discussed innovation and growth while failing to address basic organizational health issues such as staffing adequacy, process ownership, and burnout prevention. Months of excessive workload and escalating pressure resulted in predictable employee exhaustion, yet meaningful intervention from management or HR never materialized. There was also a noticeable tendency to treat systemic operational failures as isolated employee challenges instead of acknowledging broader leadership and resourcing problems. This created an environment where highly capable people spent more time compensating for organizational instability than performing strategic work.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All