employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Modernizing Medicine

Engaged Employer

They don't like to hire Americans - Associate Software Engineer Modernizing Medicine Employee Review

1.0
Jun 16, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

it pays a salary of money

Cons

they like to hire foreigners for jobs they coulda had Americans do. Americans not good enough for you? Tough - show some patriotism and love of the nation that let you be big in the first place. Settle and let Americans grow, assuming their ability really were less. But in reality, it's not. Just greedy private equity firms this company keeps being bought/sold by.

avatar
Modernizing Medicine Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your perspective. While we appreciate all feedback, we want to be very clear that the mindset reflected in this review does not align with our values or our culture. As a global company, ModMed’s mission is supported by talented team members across the United States, India, Germany, Chile, and beyond. Our commitment to hiring the best people — regardless of nationality, background, or identity — is essential to our success. We do not tolerate discrimination of any kind, and we reject the opinion in this review that someone’s value or ability is determined by where they’re from. We also believe that patriotism and inclusion are not mutually exclusive — you can love your country without demeaning others. In fact, we believe our strength as a company (and a society) comes from embracing diversity, not excluding it.

Explore other reviews about Modernizing Medicine

5.0
Jul 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work schedule, work from home, catered lunch, friendly environment

Cons

The job intself is difficult

1.0
May 12, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The strongest aspect of the company is the resilience and talent of many of its individual contributors. I worked with smart, creative people who consistently found ways to keep critical functions operating despite significant operational and resource constraints. The environment offered extensive hands-on experience with complex systems, cross-functional dependencies, and high-volume operational problem solving. Employees often gained rapid professional growth simply because they were required to manage responsibilities well beyond the scope of their formal roles.

Cons

The company’s operational philosophy often seemed to confuse endurance with effectiveness. Employees were expected to absorb expanding responsibilities indefinitely, even when workloads had clearly exceeded sustainable limits. In some cases, entire operational domains were effectively owned by a single individual with little redundancy, limited support, and no realistic contingency planning. Leadership frequently discussed innovation and growth while failing to address basic organizational health issues such as staffing adequacy, process ownership, and burnout prevention. Months of excessive workload and escalating pressure resulted in predictable employee exhaustion, yet meaningful intervention from management or HR never materialized. There was also a noticeable tendency to treat systemic operational failures as isolated employee challenges instead of acknowledging broader leadership and resourcing problems. This created an environment where highly capable people spent more time compensating for organizational instability than performing strategic work.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All