Mission and Brand Drives Engagement - Learning and Development Manager NASA Employee Review

5.0
Sep 27, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

All employees are focused on advancing humankind and being part of a great brand. This makes it easy to win the best place to work in federal government awards year after year. When you say I work for NASA there's more ooo's and ahhhh's vs if you say I work at (insert any other federal agency) where you get ewww's. NASA cares deeply about it's people and they employee a great team to continually look at how to make managers and leaders great from a base human level (so less about the tips and tricks to influence people, and more about how to build deep and trusting relationships). Pay is higher than most GS pay scales

Cons

Kingdom builders: Organizations like to feed egos and try to keep funding or cool projects to themselves vs trying to find ways to work across centers or organizations to make the most of tax payer dollars and great NASA teammate minds. Engineers are held to power point: The techincal folks usually spend more time behind computer screens finalizing PowerPoints vs being together, solving problems live, seeing things/hardware/processes/procedures in person to maximize impact. Advancement: It's government, some people retire in place (regardless of age or tenure) and up and coming talent that are looking for growth and to make an impact will leave. Some of this could be part of design, some of it is just having less emphasis on merit based reward systems that help advance/elevate those making the best contribution.

Explore other reviews about NASA

5.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice pay. And super fun

Cons

Not many cons honestly can’t think of one

1.0
Jul 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have nothing good to say.

Cons

If you are the victim of a crime or experience something illegal connected to NASA, do not blindly trust the internal process to protect you. In my experience, NASA has built relationships with local and federal agencies in a way that can push people right back into NASA’s own internal channels, including HR, the Inspector General, and Protective Services. The problem is that those offices may not have the authority, independence, or experience to properly handle serious criminal or legal issues. Once you are back inside that system, the priority can quickly become protecting the organization, managing liability, and controlling the narrative instead of protecting the person who was harmed. Victim intimidation is not just possible in that kind of environment. It should be expected. Once the organization is involved in controlling the process, the person reporting harm can end up pressured, isolated, discredited, or steered away from outside accountability. That is unacceptable. Victims should not be forced into a process where the organization involved gets to influence how the matter is handled. Internal offices are not a replacement for real legal protection, outside law enforcement, or independent legal counsel. If something illegal happens to you, talk to a lawyer first. Get independent advice. Have your attorney guide you through the appropriate outside agencies and legal channels. Do not assume NASA’s internal process is neutral, independent, or designed to protect you.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All