Tricky Business Model - Anonymous employee NIC Employee Review

1.0
Jan 18, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The work isn't particularly challenging, so some might see that as a positive. I wasn't expected to work lots of over time.

Cons

At the office I worked at, I made about 60 cents on the dollar as my peers in the industry, with my experience, make doing the same job. From my understanding, it's pretty common in NIC to make 40 to 20 percent less salary. As I see it, the company's "self-funded model" works because the workers subsidize it with lower salaries. I think that if you're in management, you might do better, but upward mobility is tricky at NIC because to move up you have to move to another state capital and most state capitals are not placing most people want to live. Because the salaries are so low, the company doesn't attract the best and the brightest therefore the quality of their work is not always up to par. So the work is by nature of being government work is often unchallenging, but because of the poor quality of people in the company, the quality suffers as well.

Explore other reviews about NIC

5.0
Sep 3, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly/Helpful employees. Schedule and salary.

Cons

I do not believe there are any cons.

4.0
Oct 22, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Overall, NIC is a company that cares about and supports its employees. I have a great work/life balance with a flexible schedule and ability to work remotely when needed. They are willing to send (relatively) junior resources to conferences that other companies would normally send high-level executives. The federal group is a pretty small and very collaborative team that enables everyone to both lead and support opportunities. Also, health insurance is covered by the company which is amazing.

Cons

Overall, I think NIC is behind in technology trends. They primarily focus on custom builds for each agency/project, which, considering their customer base of over 25 states and several federal agencies, is a costly strategy. By creating a different solution for each customer, NIC is investing more time and effort than would be necessary if they adapted a shared services model or used SaaS platforms that most agencies and companies are shifting towards. Because each state and federal agency is treated separately, NIC also uses different management approaches for each customer. This could work if there was an overarching approach that was adapted on a per customer basis, but instead there is no single set of governing principles resulting in a disjointed management approach. They are also pretty niche in capabilities in that they focus purely on using their no-cost model for citizen-facing services. This works for many cases - but not all - and they struggle to adapt/to be open to using other basic contract types like FFP and T&M. As a result, opportunities are fairly limited because they must meet very specific criteria.

4
avatar
NIC Response
7y
Thank you for the taking the time to share your perspective. We are glad to hear your experience at NIC has been positive. As you know, our employees are our most important asset and we strive to ensure we are the best place they have ever worked. Throughout our history, we have evolved as technology has evolved. We have advanced from dial-up technology, to the first mobile app for government, to delivering the first Alexa skills for government. Today this includes a balance between custom development, platforms, and standalone technology products – all designed to deliver innovative solutions that create efficiencies for government and the people they serve.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All