employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

National Wildlife Federation

Engaged Employer

Moving in the wrong direction. - Anonymous employee National Wildlife Federation Employee Review

2.0
Feb 3, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- There are truly amazing people in this organization who are dedicated, productive, and care enough to fight for positive change. This keeps people here long past their point of losing all faith in leadership. - The mission of the organization and the role we fill in the broader conservation/environmental advocacy community is powerful. - NWF is a coalition builder, bringing together diverse communities around shared interests.

Cons

- Leadership is too easily distracted by the current political environment and makes decisions based on what they believe is the politically savvy choice rather than adhering to the strategic plan. For example, it is clear that the organization is trying to bury their work on climate change, despite it being a key pillar of the strategic plan. - There is less and less care for employees. The most recent reorganization demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of that work that programs are actually doing. - While I think that it is wise to open new positions to internal hiring first since there has been a history of moving people into new positions without considering who else might be better for the role, the fact that we are currently letting successful long term employees go rather than taking the time to ensure they land on their feet is alarming. - Programs that are successful at fundraising are punished rather than rewarded. Leadership fosters a culture of jealousy around fundraising, and disincentivizes further successful fundraising by limiting how programs can spend their resources. - Leadership has an infantilizing view of staff. When concerns were raised about our performance evaluation system, those were ignored and staff were told that they just didn’t understand the system. - Leadership is gaslighting programs about funding, denying promotions when there are clearly resources to fund them as demonstrated by the salaries for new positions and the salaries of organizational leadership. - Leadership also continues to gaslight staff regarding salaries. We can see that our peers are making more money than we are, but we’re told that our salaries are competitive and that our benefits make up for it. Meanwhile, staff at the top of the organization have received hefty raises in recent years.

Explore other reviews about National Wildlife Federation

5.0
May 1, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great work place and people!

Cons

No cons for this place

3.0
Feb 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Staff are generally passionate, thoughtful, dedicated to the mission, and committed to collaboration and progress; have never worked with a more inspiring or supportive team - Work and organizational structure present opportunities to collaborate with diverse partners from across the world, both inside and outside NWF, which benefits the work and one's professional growth - True commitment to work/life balance, evidenced in both policies and messaging from leadership at multiple levels; incredibly valuable, especially for working parents and people navigating health and family issues - Teams are doing good and important work that's making a difference

Cons

- Limited potential for upward mobility - organization made welcome strides in recent years to standardize performance reviews, position descriptions, and salary bands, but rollout has been slow and confusing; in an attempt to put everyone on a level playing field leadership has blocked the ability of teams to support growth of deserving individuals; this prevents NWF from actually valuing and nurturing talent - Lack of accountability and strategic, values-based decision-making from executive-level leadership - leaders are great at couching decisions/updates in the language of humility and transparency, but outcomes and process is often anything but; staff are consistently met with defensiveness when they raise legitimate concerns about lack of clarity or shifts in programmatic structure that are unaligned with organization's strategic plan; this devalues the expertise of staff and fuels a demoralizing work environment; actions of CEO and supporting staff sometimes seem to be more interested in protecting CEO's potential future political career than the well-being of the organization they lead

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All