Fun products but limited room for growth - Engineer Newell Brands Employee Review

4.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A great place to work with fun products.

Cons

Not as much room for growth into different roles as at other places.

avatar
Newell Brands Response
2mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience and feedback. We’re glad to hear that you enjoyed working with our brands and found the products fun and engaging to be a part of. We also appreciate your candid perspective on career growth. We recognize that opportunities for movement and development can look different depending on role, timing, and business needs, and feedback like yours helps us continue to reflect on how we support career development and internal mobility. We’re grateful for the contributions you made during your time with us and wish you continued success in your career journey. Thank you again for sharing your thoughts.

Explore other reviews about Newell Brands

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good, fair, real people. Supportive environment. Best work life balance I’ve had.

Cons

You’re not making tech money. But if you like your team, the products you’re writing about, and the ability to not stress about work 24/7, it may very well be worth it.

2.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) are bright spots within the organization. Even when leadership discounted their importance and attempted to dismantle them, the ERGs remained resilient. They stayed strong, self-funded, and persevered to protect their communities and initatives until budgets were finally reinstated.

Cons

Chaotic corporate strategy, a punishing management culture, and a severe disconnect on compensation. The company has downsized three out of the last four years, pushing teams to "do more with less" without any operational logic. This environment was further strained by a rigid return-to-office (RTO) mandate that clearly functioned as a disguised effort to force employee attrition, followed by contractor replacements. Ironically, while leadership voiced major paranoia about employees working secondary jobs, they consistently paid below-market salaries, failing to realize that competitive pay is the actual key to employee focus and loyalty. Furthermore, executive leadership lacks a fundamental understanding of emerging technology. Instead of building a logical framework for AI, the company executed an abrupt shift towards it with zero strategy. This is compounded by a leadership style that is frequently passive-aggressive, combative, unwilling to teach, and quick to steal credit.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All