Great work-life balance but poor onboarding and instability - Supply Planner Newell Brands Employee Review

3.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great work life balance. I have a good Manager and the pay is on the upper end of the spectrum for this position.

Cons

Very bad onboarding. No real SOPs. Everything is based on tribal knowledge and everyone does the various job processes differently. Not a lot of stability in term of leadership. The company is always making organization changes and I have already made it through 1 reorg where %10 of the company was laid off. Big focus on AI but the company doesn't actually know how to implement it.

avatar
Newell Brands Response
1mo
Thanks for your thoughtful feedback and we appreciate you taking the time to share this. We’re happy to hear you’ve had a positive experience with your manager, pay, and work-life balance. At the same time, we recognize there’s more to do around onboarding and clarity. We also appreciate your perspective on AI—while we’re investing in innovation, we’re focused on doing so thoughtfully and in ways that meaningfully support our teams and day-to-day work and will continue to learn and evolve the best way to implement it globally. Thanks again for your feedback!

Explore other reviews about Newell Brands

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good, fair, real people. Supportive environment. Best work life balance I’ve had.

Cons

You’re not making tech money. But if you like your team, the products you’re writing about, and the ability to not stress about work 24/7, it may very well be worth it.

2.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) are bright spots within the organization. Even when leadership discounted their importance and attempted to dismantle them, the ERGs remained resilient. They stayed strong, self-funded, and persevered to protect their communities and initatives until budgets were finally reinstated.

Cons

Chaotic corporate strategy, a punishing management culture, and a severe disconnect on compensation. The company has downsized three out of the last four years, pushing teams to "do more with less" without any operational logic. This environment was further strained by a rigid return-to-office (RTO) mandate that clearly functioned as a disguised effort to force employee attrition, followed by contractor replacements. Ironically, while leadership voiced major paranoia about employees working secondary jobs, they consistently paid below-market salaries, failing to realize that competitive pay is the actual key to employee focus and loyalty. Furthermore, executive leadership lacks a fundamental understanding of emerging technology. Instead of building a logical framework for AI, the company executed an abrupt shift towards it with zero strategy. This is compounded by a leadership style that is frequently passive-aggressive, combative, unwilling to teach, and quick to steal credit.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All