There will be more layoffs than progress during your 5 year max run - Marketing Director Newell Brands Employee Review

1.0
Jan 24, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you drink the kool-aid you might be convinced to believe that great things are happening , the brands are in growth mode, and that your career is on the right trajectory.

Cons

But it’s not true. No brands at Newell are in growth mode. They are old brands sold off to Newell to suck bone dry for remaining profit. And your career is likely stalled as well, since you will likely be fired within five years. And nobody in Atlanta will touch you because Newell is known poison. It doesn’t matter who is the ceo, your division president, or marketing VP. Culture always wins and this is how Newell has been for 20+ years. It’s the brand management Death Star where brands and careers go to die. PS if you are current employee do not post on Glassdoor. Newell HR collects these reviews and tries to determine authorship. Actively.

Explore other reviews about Newell Brands

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good, fair, real people. Supportive environment. Best work life balance I’ve had.

Cons

You’re not making tech money. But if you like your team, the products you’re writing about, and the ability to not stress about work 24/7, it may very well be worth it.

2.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) are bright spots within the organization. Even when leadership discounted their importance and attempted to dismantle them, the ERGs remained resilient. They stayed strong, self-funded, and persevered to protect their communities and initatives until budgets were finally reinstated.

Cons

Chaotic corporate strategy, a punishing management culture, and a severe disconnect on compensation. The company has downsized three out of the last four years, pushing teams to "do more with less" without any operational logic. This environment was further strained by a rigid return-to-office (RTO) mandate that clearly functioned as a disguised effort to force employee attrition, followed by contractor replacements. Ironically, while leadership voiced major paranoia about employees working secondary jobs, they consistently paid below-market salaries, failing to realize that competitive pay is the actual key to employee focus and loyalty. Furthermore, executive leadership lacks a fundamental understanding of emerging technology. Instead of building a logical framework for AI, the company executed an abrupt shift towards it with zero strategy. This is compounded by a leadership style that is frequently passive-aggressive, combative, unwilling to teach, and quick to steal credit.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All