BADLEY MANAGED, POORLY LED, AND A LACK OF INTEGRITY AT THE TOP - Vice President, Executive Management Newmark Employee Review

1.0
Dec 5, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It is a good idea, looks good on paper, and they are making big waves by spending tens of millions of dollars taking broker teams from Cushman and CBRE. If you are a stockholder when they sell the company you might make a few dollars per share.

Cons

I was hired under a detailed business plan, cost/revenue projection, and three year contract to lead a new service line at Newmark. It was all properly vetted and fully approved by the COO but after more than 9 months into the 2016 fiscal year I still had not been allowed to hire any of the people I needed and was promised. In the meantime my boss was submitting false and misleading revenue numbers to enhance quarterly earnings reports to Wall Street. Newmark (GGC Partners is a publicly traded company). The COO did not return a single telephone call or email message (ever). I went to HR then the CEO and was fired less than two weeks later. No investigation was ever conducted. CONS - Training, internal lines of communication (to management), internal controls, outdated and inconsistent IT systems, no upward feedback on superiors, human resources, internal reporting mechanisms, anti-retaliation policies, adherence to internal polices/codes, Cantor Fitzgerald HR and Legal departments serving Newmark business units, integrity, double standards, poor leadership, and just bad management. No wonder they can't get their stock to go above $9 per share.

Explore other reviews about Newmark

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work for students

Cons

Nothing bad to say about the role

2.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

When I first joined Newmark in 2021 I could not have been more happy with the company, my manager, leadership, compensation, growth, and opportunities

Cons

The company made the decision to replace US based workers with employees based in Mexico so that they could offer lower wages. It was extremely disappointing to find that after almost five years with the company that I would be replaced by employees who could afford to accept lower wages.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All