High tech, Cool work, unrealistic program management - Advisory Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

4.0
Jun 14, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Our products are all about the technology. The technology is interesting, the work is challenging. We work on products that bring war-fighters home alive, or better yet, keep them out of harm's way altogether. The engineers are focused on providing new, creative better solutions to our customer's problems.

Cons

The relentless pressure on productivity. Every program is too tight on funding. Baltimore has a unionized manufacturing workforce. We are in a continual mode of rationalizing cost over-runs because we cannot seem to accurately bid any job. Our typical program management response to any quote is "cut the dollars by a third, and the time in half."

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
May 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work arrangement, 9/80 schedule, job security

Cons

Low pay, full time on site required for career growth

1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All