A "10/10" on the Toxicity Scale – Micro-management Over Results - Software Engineer OpenGov Employee Review

1.0
Mar 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The "startup energy" is present, and the speed of the environment could be a positive for some. ​Free lunches are provided (though they don't compensate for the lack of work-life balance). ​Individual local leaders are decent people, but they are unfortunately bound by rigid top-down mandates.

Cons

Cons: ​Extreme Micro-management: There is an obsessive focus on swipe-in/swipe-out times and "butt-in-seat" metrics. This culture of surveillance creates a disconnect where employees focus more on attendance logs than actual productivity. ​Bait-and-Switch Tactics: Expectations set during the interview process regarding WFH flexibility and "normal" hours are disregarded immediately upon joining. ​Toxic Leadership Philosophy: Instructions from the top seem to view professionals as "assets to be controlled" rather than experts to be trusted. This lack of trust is palpable and damaging to morale. ​Zero Work-Life Boundaries: Meetings are routinely scheduled as late as 10:00 PM. Quality of life, family time, and personal health are treated as secondary to the "rush," despite what the official company values might claim. ​Illusory Feedback Loops: Internal "anonymous" surveys are not perceived as anonymous. Employees feel forced to provide perfect scores out of fear of retaliation, meaning leadership is operating on false data.

avatar
OpenGov Response
4mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We’re sorry this was your experience, and we’re committed to creating a consistently great culture for everyone. Managers should be engaged in ways that empower and support, and our Leadership Development Program for managers across the company reinforces those expectations through ongoing coaching and alignment. We also take your feedback on balance seriously; our mission to power more effective and accountable government is demanding, and we want to help teammates do the best work of their careers alongside their personal priorities. For clarity, any internal surveys we designate as anonymous are anonymous, and we rely on that feedback to shape programs and policies. We appreciate your perspective and are committed to continuing to improve.

Explore other reviews about OpenGov

5.0
Jul 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fast paced, innovative 10x skills faster anywhere than I ever been Ownership Office Culture - Make it what you will

Cons

not for everyone tough but fair

1.0
May 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The startup-era culture here was genuinely good — collaborative, energetic, people-first. As the company grew, so did the ego. Leadership lost what made the place work and replaced it with a top-down, my-way culture that has driven out some of the best people.

Cons

I'm writing the review I wish had existed when I was researching this company. Not checking Glassdoor before I started was my single biggest professional regret. Promotion is positioned during recruiting as a near-term, achievable goal. In reality, the criteria are vague, inconsistently applied, and rarely result in actual advancement. KPIs are set at levels that ensure most reps will fall short — creating a perpetual sense of failure that serves management's pressure tactics, not your career growth. Advancement often appears less tied to clear performance metrics and more dependent on subjective favoritism, including maintaining close alignment with or “sucking up to” hiring managers and leadership, rather than merit alone. Transparency is essentially nonexistent. Turnover in the SDR org specifically is high and ongoing, but it’s never acknowledged or addressed internally. Candidates have no way of knowing the full picture going in. One more thing worth knowing: account executives are coached during training to post positive Glassdoor reviews. Please weigh that when you look at the overall rating. “Unlimited PTO” is also not as flexible as it may be presented. In practice, time off appears to be closely monitored and can be restricted, even for high performers, based on internal perceptions of fairness across the team rather than true flexibility or performance-based trust. This makes the benefit feel more like a recruiting talking point than an actual employee perk.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All