unlikely to ever improve - Marketing Coordinator Oxford University Press Employee Review

2.0
Oct 20, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

One star because a lot of the younger people in entry level are cool, intelligent, and nice. There were a few office committees and events which provided a much needed opportunity for social decompression. Second star because the second manager I had was a vast improvement on the first, although I still didn't receive much help with moving up in the company, and the president of the NYC office is as earnest as he is charming (really though - he was the only mentor I did have).

Cons

There's absolutely no diversity, the managers are incompetent at best and downright abusive at worst (it was mostly worst). I was yelled at, gossipped about, left off of emails and meetings, not because I ever received a poor performance review (I didn't, rather all my reviews were glowing), but because the editors and upper management are egotistical, self-centered, bratty, and resistant to feedback. I spent many, many days crying or having panic attacks at or after work. The office is permeated by white feminism, cisheteronormativity, and a flagrant condescension that floats through the air in a WASPy mist of passive aggression. Naive post-college kids, armed with fancy publishing course certificates and Daddy's extra income, come in week after week being told that they will move up, that being good at their jobs will take them far, that if they don't want to take the job for peanut salaries, then some other rich white kid living in Chelsea will be right around the corner and one day become the next star editor of Nobody Reads These Books, published Spring 2032. In reality, no one is promoted, the pay is beyond laughable even if you do move up, and the amount of money you'll spend on therapy to feed your emptied soul negates it anyway. No, in reality you'll spend a few years being verbally abused by crusty Eurocentric editors, each more pseudo-liberal than the last, before you realize you DESERVE BETTER and get out fast as you can for a real job.

avatar
Oxford University Press Response
7y
Thank you for sharing your feedback, though it is disconcerting for us to read. Some of the issues you raise—especially regarding the diversity of our workforce—are ones we’re actively addressing and on which we’ve made tangible progress in recent years, thanks in no small part to the investment and passion of our people. We have numerous committees and initiatives focusing on inclusion, workplace culture, content, and recruitment and retention, and we are making considerable strides in our New York office. However, experience suggests that there are peaks and valleys in any such transformation work, and we still have a lot of work to do. Regarding your point about people being promoted, it’s important to note that many of our editors have risen to their current roles from entry-level positions; we are very fortunate at OUP to have so many talented people working with us. We hope that our people may use their positions and experiences at OUP as a springboard to their next job whether within OUP or outside of the organization. We are sorry that your experience here wasn’t more positive, and would welcome the opportunity to discuss your feedback further. You can get in touch by emailing glassdoor@oup.com.

Explore other reviews about Oxford University Press

5.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team supervises your work. You get to learn proper citation standards and write academically. You don't have too tight deadlines and can work from wherever.

Cons

I have not identified any negative aspect of being an Oxford Reporter.

3.0
Jun 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people to work with.

Cons

No great pay or compensation.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All