employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Patelco Credit Union

Engaged Employer

The so call SF branch supervisor is a paid troll for the current corrupt upper management. - Branch Manager Patelco Credit Union Employee Review

1.0
Oct 29, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Wonderful coworker who can always be counted on to assist you when needed. They are extremely supportive. 401k plan is one of the best.

Cons

This so call SF branch supervisor is giving the branch management a bad reputation. Does it make you feel good to call people names because they don't agree with the way the company is treating them. Look at the majority of the reviews and see that 90% of the issue are identical. Calling yourself educated because you feel that your supervisor position makes you better than the other staffs. This is the problem with patelco is that some of you in management are so damn arrogant. I have been a manager at the branch for many years and have always encourage open communication with my staff. I listen to their concerns and built a great trusting relationship with them. I do not degrade them for speaking out about their concerns. You, SF branch supervisor, need to take a class on how to manage your people though trust and respect.

Explore other reviews about Patelco Credit Union

5.0
Mar 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Upfront job structure and compensation schedule. Room for upward growth.

Cons

Smaller entity; new opportunities not always available

avatar
Patelco Credit Union Response
3mo
Thank you for taking the time to share a review and for taking care of our members. We understand how important growth opportunities are and hope you were able to take advantage of the professional development resources while you were on our team. As we continually strive to help our team grow, we will keep your comments in mind.
3.0
Jul 1, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Their vision and mission are great and Patelco is really about helping members, however the work life balance is horrible.

Cons

Work–life balance is essentially nonexistent under the current PTO structure. The system is outdated and unrealistic. Staff are required to submit all time‑off requests at the end of the year, as if everyone can plan their personal lives twelve months in advance. Each region can be more than ten branches, yet only three employees are allowed to be off at any given time. If you need time off and those three slots are already filled, your request is automatically denied. Because branches are expected to cover one another for vacations, call‑outs, and general staffing gaps, PTO is restricted to protect coverage rather than support employees. This approach prioritizes administrative convenience over real people with real, unpredictable lives. It is built around coverage, not humanity, and work–life balance becomes collateral damage. Leadership repeatedly emphasizes that “business needs come first,” but for a company centered on helping people, you would expect a stronger commitment to supporting the well‑being of its own staff.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All