employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Philadelphia Insurance Companies

Engaged Employer

Comfortable. I know I could be making more money elsewhere, but I'm hanging in to see what happens with Tokio Marine. - Underwriter Philadelphia Insurance Companies Employee Review

4.0
Oct 11, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Vacation time- 3 weeks vacation, plus additional vacation time you can buy-- my total of 4 weeks makes me re-think looking elsewhere. Fitness oriented environment Casual Technology

Cons

Pay less than industry standard. This used to be inline with the workload, but now it is not. Difficult to be promoted. They seem to have "flagged" certain ppl they want to move up the food chain and unless you are on that list it is very difficult to get on it.

Explore other reviews about Philadelphia Insurance Companies

5.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility with a hybrid work schedule. Ability to learn more products, so it can be challenging but fun if you are looking for growth. Metrics and everyone knows what to expect which seems to be industry standard across small business.

Cons

None. PTO comparative seems light as you start out.

3.0
Feb 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice people, focus on technology, upper management is usually ahead of insurance trends, immediate supervisors were nice and well meaning. Benefits are good, not great. Good amount of PTO.

Cons

In small business unit, you have monthly quotas and managers are constantly asking how much you are quoting and if you will reach that number. Various levels of punishment if you don’t hit this number. Quality of work, risk selection, accuracy doesn’t really matter, only how much you quote. There is no positive in hitting this number beyond not being bothered until the next month. If you exceed this number consistently, you’ll just be asked to do more. Company is doing everything in its power to save expenses. The pay rate is well below the market. People consistently leave and make much more money elsewhere. Most lower level jobs are being shipped to an Indian company and even the Indian company is having job functions replaced by AI. This is usually at the expense of quality or what our agents actually want. CEOs preach saving expenses and not replacing people, as they show up to your office after flying in a private jet and a car service. Finally, 90% of the people in the region I worked were related to somebody who either works there, were their friends, or were related to agents we did business with. Some of these people had positions made for them, where they sat there and studied for 6 months, instead of promoting people from within. This will also prevent job mobility.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All