employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Philadelphia Insurance Companies

Engaged Employer

Blunt Objective Review Of Company - Underwriter Philadelphia Insurance Companies Employee Review

1.0
Feb 13, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility with schedules and onsite gym at home office.

Cons

I left the organization on good terms so here is as objective as a review as you will get. First and foremost this is a marketing firm. Underwriters are not valued, do not call the shots and are not compensated appropriately. PHLY is notorious for overworking and underpaying their employees. Senior management will attempt to sell you on your "trajectory" within the organization but they fail to deliver on their promise many times. Even if you were to move up the ranks quickly, you will always be under-compensated in comparison to the rest of the marketplace for whatever title you hold. Senior management does not value it's employees. Their bonuses are tied to staying below budgets so they do whatever they can to keep your compensation as low as possible. Throughout my time with the organization it has grown horizontally quite a bit. There is an over abundance of managers and not nearly enough worker bees. In my final 12 months with the organization my department saw almost a 40% turnover rate. The individuals that left were all experienced and knowledgeable and in typical PHLY fashion more work got piled on to the rest of thee underwriting team and several underwriting trainees were hired to fill the void. Senior management has advised that they have problems hiring experienced talent so this trend is likely to continue into the future. The organization's training program for new hires and continued education for experienced employees is essentially nonexistent. Even if training was offered employees would not be able to attend due to extremely high workloads. The company is more worried about hiring people to process rather than to truly underwrite risks. There is minimal agency relationships as the company does not have appointed agents. If you are the type to ask questions and areas for improvement, senior management will view you as a threat and your "trajectory" within the company will be nonexistent. I would not recommend this company to anyone whether friend or foe. Unless the company were to blow you away with a compensation package, steer clear.

Explore other reviews about Philadelphia Insurance Companies

5.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility with a hybrid work schedule. Ability to learn more products, so it can be challenging but fun if you are looking for growth. Metrics and everyone knows what to expect which seems to be industry standard across small business.

Cons

None. PTO comparative seems light as you start out.

3.0
Feb 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice people, focus on technology, upper management is usually ahead of insurance trends, immediate supervisors were nice and well meaning. Benefits are good, not great. Good amount of PTO.

Cons

In small business unit, you have monthly quotas and managers are constantly asking how much you are quoting and if you will reach that number. Various levels of punishment if you don’t hit this number. Quality of work, risk selection, accuracy doesn’t really matter, only how much you quote. There is no positive in hitting this number beyond not being bothered until the next month. If you exceed this number consistently, you’ll just be asked to do more. Company is doing everything in its power to save expenses. The pay rate is well below the market. People consistently leave and make much more money elsewhere. Most lower level jobs are being shipped to an Indian company and even the Indian company is having job functions replaced by AI. This is usually at the expense of quality or what our agents actually want. CEOs preach saving expenses and not replacing people, as they show up to your office after flying in a private jet and a car service. Finally, 90% of the people in the region I worked were related to somebody who either works there, were their friends, or were related to agents we did business with. Some of these people had positions made for them, where they sat there and studied for 6 months, instead of promoting people from within. This will also prevent job mobility.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All