- We have all high-performing A-players in the company right now so I love working here and the customer experiences we produce. I have never worked in a company with all A-players before.
- Legitimately a very solid business opportunity that will provide customers with an industry-leading experience.
- Very customer experience-focused, bleeding-edge tech stack, and no problem changing business practices on a dime.
Cons
Currently, Pie Insurance is a start-up so all the common differences between how a start-up operates versus a large mature company apply. While I love it, Pie may not be right for folks that want huge budgets, very large Teams and mature processes.
Pie Insurance Response
7y
Thank you for the stars. We are glad you are a part of our team!
-The People Team @ Pie
Explore other reviews about Pie Insurance
5.0
Oct 23, 2025
Anonymous employee
Current employee, less than 1 year
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook
Pros
Pie is mission-driven and focused on modernizing an outdated industry, giving employees the chance to build products that genuinely help small businesses. The organization embraces modern technology and design thinking, encouraging innovation, experimentation, and new ideas. Leadership is accessible and human, and the company invests in connection and community even in a remote environment.
Cons
Because Pie is growing fast, change is constant—if you need rigid structure or slow, steady routines, it may feel overwhelming at times.
I worked with many talented, thoughtful engineers who cared about building reliable systems and supporting each other. The remote environment was generally workable, and there were meaningful technical problems to solve across backend services, APIs, data quality, production support, and customer-facing workflows. I also appreciated opportunities to take ownership, mentor teammates, and work on systems that had real operational impact.
Cons
Priorities and organizational direction could shift quickly, which sometimes made it harder to plan long-term technical work or understand how career growth would be evaluated. Communication around larger company changes could have been clearer and more timely. Career progression, role expectations, and decision-making sometimes felt uneven across teams.