employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

ProTech Services Group

Is this your company?

Can’t Get Back Time You Waste - Anonymous employee ProTech Services Group Employee Review

1.0
Dec 13, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Managers speak of training (does not surpass this point) -8 hour job if you make under a certain salary -high employee turnover so you can train new employees

Cons

-do not follow core values -no promotions unless you befriend the president -lack of fairness and equality -intimidation when you put in two weeks -titles are a joke and ruin morale for those that take their career seriously

avatar
ProTech Services Group Response
7y
Thank you for your review. We take critiques seriously and utilize them to better our business, however, there are a few things from your review that we would like to clarify. ProTech offers various training opportunities for both our engineers and sales force. These are often vendor or distributor driven and require specific pre-requisites which may disqualify certain employees from enrolling. Because we are a small, local business, we often do not have promotions available. We are not a large corporation with an extensive hierarchy of work, instead we place people in the positions they are best suited and allow them to grow that position. And because of this, we understand when employees leave to further their careers. We will always try to retain those employees, especially when they have proven themselves as company assets, however, we do not condone intimidation efforts. While we regret that you did not enjoy your time with us, we strive to create a positive work environment and are constantly looking for ways to improve upon our culture.

Explore other reviews about ProTech Services Group

5.0
May 9, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Management, Family orientated, Good pay

Cons

None, None, None, None, None

1.0
May 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart, hardworking peers at the individual contributor level

Cons

Throughout my time spent here, one pattern defined the experience: middle management would set a direction, teams would commit real work and real client promises to it, and then the senior leadership would steer things somewhere else entirely. What you were told on Monday rarely survived to Friday. The CEO was also largely absent day to day. Decisions that affected entire teams were made with little visibility into how or by whom, and there was almost no direct access to the executive making them. The cost was real: wasted effort, missed commitments, and a steady erosion of trust. You cannot plan, you cannot deliver, and eventually you stop believing anything leadership says. Ideas get sold internally and to clients, then quietly abandoned with no one accountable for the gap. Roles were also poorly defined. Engineers routinely carried account-management responsibilities that should have sat with dedicated staff, and the lines between business functions were never properly drawn. The more senior you became, the more of this you absorbed. Growth in the role meant inheriting other people's job descriptions rather than deepening your own. The turnover speaks for itself. Over my time here, I watched a steady stream of capable people decide it wasn't worth staying, and when good people leave that consistently, it's not a coincidence, it's a verdict. I raised concerns about practices I believed were improper. I was laid off shortly after. I'll let the timing speak for itself. I did work here I was genuinely proud of, and the clearest sign of how things ended is that I chose to leave those years off my resume rather than risk how they might be characterized by the very leaders who failed us. Prospective employees should weigh carefully how this company treats people who ask uncomfortable questions, and how it speaks of them once they're gone.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All