employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Project Lead The Way

Engaged Employer

PLTW - Anonymous employee Project Lead The Way Employee Review

2.0
Jul 7, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Solid benefits and PTO. Many people working there are nice and well-meaning, and some are mission driven. Helping students and teachers (directly or indirectly) is a great outcome of your day-to-day work.

Cons

Project scoping and deadlines are consistently laughable. Too many managers/directors/VPs/C-level people, and many don't understand or simply couldn't do the job of their subordinates. A lot of people stepping on others to get ahead and throwing each other under the bus, meanwhile the mission of the organization gets lost. Now that I hear they are outsourcing their IT work to India, I'm not sure what the mission is. It was to promote STEM education to students in the US but off-shoring the work is wholly ironic. How would they explain to their engineering and computing students that they off-shore their own jobs? Turnover was pretty high, many great people left, and morale was pretty low. What could have a been a great opportunity for a model workplace and a great mission had devolved into a negative atmosphere fueled by shady office politics and poor management. In the end I'm really disappointed.

Explore other reviews about Project Lead The Way

5.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fantastic Gig, great company. Would do it again!

Cons

Online (remote) teaching of Core Engineering Courses vs In Person.

3.0
Jun 21, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The individual contributes that work with you on your team are great people committed to helping schools have favorable outcomes and drive student impact. Company benefits are the best I’ve had in my professional career.

Cons

• In the past month alone, over 25 employees were laid off without transparency or clear criteria around who was impacted or why. • Leadership continues to say the organization is financially strong, which contradicts recent layoffs and ongoing instability. • The engagement team is led by toxic leadership—cliquish, exclusionary, and hostile to feedback. • Sales lacks basic tools to be successful: no lead generation strategy, reps can’t create their own quotes, and revenue goals are avoided because leadership believes schools “aren’t ready” to talk about money. • There’s a deep identity crisis—are we focused on revenue or on mission? The lack of clarity is hurting both. • The org is extremely top-heavy. Leadership teams meet constantly but rarely communicate decisions or direction to the rest of the staff. • Despite the CEO’s claims that the org is progressive and innovative, it’s resistant to change and clings to outdated systems and thinking. • Promotions and visibility are limited to those within a small Indianapolis-based network. If you’re not part of the inner circle, you’re overlooked. • Employees don’t feel safe reaching out to HR, as feedback often leads to retaliation. • New ideas are not welcomed. If you raise concerns or suggest improvements, you’re labeled “difficult” and shut out.

14
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All