employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Project Lead The Way

Engaged Employer

Rapidly changing organization, in more good ways than bad - Anonymous employee Project Lead The Way Employee Review

4.0
Jul 12, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent benefits and (at least in my area) compensation within market range; Rewarding mission to serve education in positive and innovative ways; People who care and (for the most part) have a shared spirit of collaboration and teamwork; Management (at least in my area) that tries extremely hard to develop people and support their growth; Rapid change over the last several years that was both exciting and rewarding to be a part of

Cons

Support areas of the organization always struggling to keep up with operational demands and priority shifts; Deadlines set (and often non-negotiable for reasons sometimes understandable and sometimes not) prior to full analysis of all that would be needed for execution and with little room for prioritization or more agile approach to execution and delivery; Areas of the organization embrace change while other areas resist it or fail to actively participate in it (and then complain about it); The strongest, most talented people carry the lionshare of the work and get burnt out rather quickly; Leadership team appears aligned in spirit but not always in practice, and there has been little change/turnover at that level for several years

Explore other reviews about Project Lead The Way

5.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fantastic Gig, great company. Would do it again!

Cons

Online (remote) teaching of Core Engineering Courses vs In Person.

3.0
Jun 21, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The individual contributes that work with you on your team are great people committed to helping schools have favorable outcomes and drive student impact. Company benefits are the best I’ve had in my professional career.

Cons

• In the past month alone, over 25 employees were laid off without transparency or clear criteria around who was impacted or why. • Leadership continues to say the organization is financially strong, which contradicts recent layoffs and ongoing instability. • The engagement team is led by toxic leadership—cliquish, exclusionary, and hostile to feedback. • Sales lacks basic tools to be successful: no lead generation strategy, reps can’t create their own quotes, and revenue goals are avoided because leadership believes schools “aren’t ready” to talk about money. • There’s a deep identity crisis—are we focused on revenue or on mission? The lack of clarity is hurting both. • The org is extremely top-heavy. Leadership teams meet constantly but rarely communicate decisions or direction to the rest of the staff. • Despite the CEO’s claims that the org is progressive and innovative, it’s resistant to change and clings to outdated systems and thinking. • Promotions and visibility are limited to those within a small Indianapolis-based network. If you’re not part of the inner circle, you’re overlooked. • Employees don’t feel safe reaching out to HR, as feedback often leads to retaliation. • New ideas are not welcomed. If you raise concerns or suggest improvements, you’re labeled “difficult” and shut out.

14
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All