employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Project Lead The Way

Engaged Employer

Sinking ship - Anonymous employee Project Lead The Way Employee Review

1.0
Jan 30, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits, competitive pay for non-profit

Cons

People at VP level are all either friends of the CEO (like a former basketball coach!) or former colleagues of the CEO (former principals from when he was a superintendent, even a former student from his days as a principal). It is absolutely impossible to get promoted there - many employees have been in director-level roles for 5+ years, with promises of promotions, etc. Lots of dead weight at the VP level, including VPs in remote positions who openly brag about how little they do. Very high turnover, very unequal distribution of work/responsibilities. Very top-down organization - little to no input from people on the ground. Lots of internal chatter about racism, sexism, and homophobia among management.

Explore other reviews about Project Lead The Way

5.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fantastic Gig, great company. Would do it again!

Cons

Online (remote) teaching of Core Engineering Courses vs In Person.

3.0
Jun 21, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The individual contributes that work with you on your team are great people committed to helping schools have favorable outcomes and drive student impact. Company benefits are the best I’ve had in my professional career.

Cons

• In the past month alone, over 25 employees were laid off without transparency or clear criteria around who was impacted or why. • Leadership continues to say the organization is financially strong, which contradicts recent layoffs and ongoing instability. • The engagement team is led by toxic leadership—cliquish, exclusionary, and hostile to feedback. • Sales lacks basic tools to be successful: no lead generation strategy, reps can’t create their own quotes, and revenue goals are avoided because leadership believes schools “aren’t ready” to talk about money. • There’s a deep identity crisis—are we focused on revenue or on mission? The lack of clarity is hurting both. • The org is extremely top-heavy. Leadership teams meet constantly but rarely communicate decisions or direction to the rest of the staff. • Despite the CEO’s claims that the org is progressive and innovative, it’s resistant to change and clings to outdated systems and thinking. • Promotions and visibility are limited to those within a small Indianapolis-based network. If you’re not part of the inner circle, you’re overlooked. • Employees don’t feel safe reaching out to HR, as feedback often leads to retaliation. • New ideas are not welcomed. If you raise concerns or suggest improvements, you’re labeled “difficult” and shut out.

14
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All