Fast growing ed-tech company - Anonymous employee Quizlet Employee Review

5.0
Jul 4, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Product is well-loved by millions of students and teachers. This is a solid foundation that'll help fuel our audacious ambitions. - Disproportional impact. We are a 50 people company, with ~35M monthly users. This means we get to innovate and also make a big impact. - Growing quickly. The company has been around for 10 years, with a great product-market fit and steady growth. Recently stepped on the gas by raising our first round of VC funding and growing team by 5X. - Employees and leadership are mission oriented, smart, humble and friendly.

Cons

We are figuring out better processes as we grow. This is being handled quite well, collaboratively and transparently.

Explore other reviews about Quizlet

5.0
Mar 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

great people, good work culture, professional, flexible,

Cons

Hard to fully integrate as a contractor

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There was a community of talented, caring individuals (ICs and middle management) who supported each other and were passionate about shipping quality features for Quizlet's users.

Cons

- There has been no strategy for years. If there ever is one, it veers mid-quarter. Work assignments veer accordingly. Then leadership blames anyone but themselves when productivity tanks. - The CEO and his army of VPs brought "Amazon/Google accountability" to engineering, and want to drive out what they see as a bunch of low performers. They demonstrate zero ability to distinguish between "low performer" and "mvp". So they drove out most of the mvps. That's in consumer experience engineering btw. There is a smoking crater where the Data & AI org used to be. - The CPO did nothing for years except kill the ideas of his product managers. No ideas, no direction, no support. - Leadership has massive fomo about alleged AI productivity. They measure it with poorly correlated metrics like commits, PRs, lines of code written etc. They keep deciding they haven't replaced enough "low performers" with AI. They’re desperate to drive two or three new features a week, and so they have driven the company into the ground.

8
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All