Consulting Review - Anonymous employee Riveron Employee Review

2.0
Aug 6, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Good place for financial diligence work. Cheap pricing ensure solid stream of accounting-type diligence work. -Strong emphasis on culture, socializing, etc. - great for young professionals -Significant investment in infrastructure - almost unreal how a small company has such a vast infrastructure and resource as % of revenue -Great in selling the young, entrepreneurial image to its clients (though often smoke and mirrors)

Cons

- Other than financial diligence work, the rest of the organization is a low quality finance staff augmentation shop - the consulting organization does not have anyone at Manager level and above, especially Director level, who has professional consulting experience from a reputable consulting organization - no strategy on how to grow consulting business (BAS), and the company is not interested in developing one. Essentially anything that is not financial diligence (TAS) and FAS (controls, tech accounting), falls into consulting BAS groups - no sophisticated intellectual capital for consulting - no dedicated BAS business development, or even Director level, staff (all left the firm for above mentioned reasons) - the variable pay components prevents Mgr and above level staff from realizing their full financial compensation. At Sr. Mgr + level there should be some time backed-in for business development, but it is not. For example, Analyst utilization level should be expected from a Principal level person. - difficulty selling consulting projects; most end up being staff augmentation projects - too many unreal promises during hiring interviews

Explore other reviews about Riveron

5.0
Jun 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility Opportunity Sharp colleagues Additional incentives

Cons

Working hours Remote work Unclear upside path

1.0
Apr 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent swag and they have education stipends. Allows remote work which was very appreciated.

Cons

Too political and heavy on finger-pointing rather than collaboration. Blame often falls on inexperienced staff for issues beyond their control, while "who you know" (especially in the Texas office) dictates accountability. Additionally, the US team’s subconscious bias toward the India team creates a counterproductive and unwelcome environment. It ultimately feels like a fend-for-yourself environment. When performance is evaluated, support is limited unless you’ve already proven you can meet management’s demanding, often unrealistic, expectations. This makes it especially difficult for early-career professionals to learn and grow. The focus tends to be more on maximizing billable hours than on development or quality of work. In some cases, there has even been pressure from multiple managers to inflate timesheet entries to improve the appearance of performance and increase client billing, despite work being completed efficiently. These expectations were consistently communicated verbally rather than documented, raising serious ethical concerns and making the situation even more discouraging.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All