Market Development Robots - Market Development Representative SAP Concur Employee Review

1.0
Sep 25, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have nothing good to say about this role, and the direction that this department is it going in, now. When I started that was a much different story but the new management has made that irrelevant. Concur as a company has an incredible culture, a fun work environment and awesome PTO. The Market Development department has completely derailed from all of the good that Concur has to offer.

Cons

Those that have been around for more than a few months know that Market Development was an incredible place to grow your career, learn the business and critically think about new ways to get in with prospects and try new methods. Under new management, Market Development is very quickly turning into a call center. Their intent is to turn this into a "brainless" role where we come in, hit a go button on a machine that auto-dials for you, then finally get to go home after you've hit your required amount of time for the day. They have removed every other aspect of the job that we all enjoyed the most, leaving bombarding prospects with multiple calls a day, to be the only thing left. If you have a college degree, or like to use your brain at any time throughout the work day, this role is not for you. In addition, the new management is degrading, extremely micro managing and you are a nobody to them unless you're drinking the Kool-Aid and pretending to love the new brainless robotic model of the role. Don't try to speak up or give your opinion because it will be wrong. Just sit in your chair on your auto-dialer and keep your mouth shut pretending to be happy. Again, any other position within Concur you are likely going to be happy. The culture, management and employee morale is top notch. Just steer clear of Market Development!!!

Explore other reviews about SAP Concur

5.0
Apr 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance is great

Cons

Forgot about growth unless switch teams which is very difficult

1.0
May 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Compensation & Benefits: The benefits package, including health insurance and the unlimited sick leave policy, is solid and competitive. Peer Group: There is a subset of highly intelligent, hardworking individual contributors who genuinely care about the product and engineering excellence. Slow Pace (until it isn't): For those looking for a slower-paced environment, the workload is manageable and expectations are low, making it a comfortable place to coast in the short term. The exception is when everyone realizes there is a deadline and someone has to pull some heroics to make up for mismanagement. If you are not this hero, then you can continue to relax.

Cons

Operational Offloading: The recurring annual layoffs and reorganizations have severely damaged team structures. Eliminating specialized QA teams and PMs has not streamlined the organization; instead, it has dumped non-engineering overhead (like running manual test suites and project management) directly onto software engineers, distracting them from core development. Stagnant Tech Stack & AI Paralysis: The technical direction is hampered by conservative decision-making and a slow-to-paranoid adoption rate of newer technologies. A heavy reliance on legacy systems, combined with extreme hesitation around modern industry tools and AI, has left the product architecture lagging behind industry standards. Internal Team Toxicity: While individual experiences vary, middle management is usually quite toxic but frequently lacks objective accountability. Active, high-performing engineers who advocate for structural or process improvements are often targeted. Performance evaluations, compensation allocations (such as bonuses), and leadership opportunities (like Team Lead tracks) are sometimes leveraged punitively to reward quiet compliance over actual technical merit. Useless Skip-Level Paths: The escalation path is structurally broken. Skip-level managers and directors consistently default to protecting the middle-management hierarchy to avoid conflict, completely ignoring valid documentation of retaliation and favoritism. Inter-Team Friction & Duplication: Product verticals operate in silos, creating massive friction. Feature teams regularly bypass platform architectural standards or duplicate core services (even attempting to split off competing apps) just to circumvent platform dependencies. This political maneuvering results in disjointed, fragmented end-user experiences. Parent Company Resistance (Concur vs. SAP): There is an internal narrative that Concur must remain "special" and separate from SAP. Local leadership frequently resists standardizing SAP-wide operational policies, such as unified design languages, centralized security/privacy frameworks, and modern, structured agile practices, hindering true product maturity, even when engineers are begging for anything to improve conditions. Attrition: With all the above issues, there are no good, motivated engineers left. The ones who were brave enough to speak up or act to improve things were either chased away by the toxic people and environment or beaten down into apathetic obedience.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All