employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Security Benefit Group

Is this your company?

Not as great as everyone thinks - Finance Associate Security Benefit Group Employee Review

2.0
Aug 5, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Most of your coworkers are easy to get along with. Pay and benefits are decent.

Cons

Management can DEFINITELY improve. You are given tasks and expected to do those tasks BUT there is very little build up from there. Very little additional training. Don't expect to move up. You will be hired into that position and then remain there until you quit or retire. If you want to move up, you need to leave the company and return. I saw very few people promote from within without leaving. All your work is due by the time you get it. There is a huge focus on getting things done earlier, but it always seems late at the beginning of the process and then everyone is trying to play catch up.

Explore other reviews about Security Benefit Group

5.0
Sep 13, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

SB was a great place to intern, offering the ability to gain real hands on experience. Everyone made sure to play a part in making my internship a success, and allowed me the opportunity to learn about other teams, business units, and communicate with top management.

Cons

No cons from me, my internship was a great experience with no shortcomings.

1.0
Jan 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

none. Kansas based interns preferred.

Cons

This is a small company with very limited processes and standards, and whatever standards exist are rarely followed. There is little to no proper documentation, no effective Scrum Master, no story-pointing, and no clear technical leadership hierarchy. If you come from a company with mature engineering practices, it can be very difficult to adapt and work here. A non-technical product manager largely drives decisions, while senior technical leadership is mostly uninvolved. Your experience heavily depends on the product leader you are assigned to—if that leadership is weak, it becomes extremely challenging to succeed. The HR function exists mostly in name only, and reporting concerns is unlikely to lead to meaningful action. While there are a few good managers, working with them is mostly a matter of luck rather than structure. Stories are assigned with minimal or no context, and there is no concept of backlog grooming or refinement. The architecture is outdated, the codebase is largely legacy, and documentation is almost nonexistent. Genuine technical input is rarely appreciated or acted upon. This environment may suit very junior employees or interns who are comfortable simply following instructions, but it can be frustrating for experienced professionals who value structure, collaboration, and modern engineering practices.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All