1. Top heavy structure.
There are MANY MANY managers here and created roles that i know for a fact few understand. Where there is concern about velocity and or deliverables the answer always seems to be to throw resource at the problem...hire lots of Managing Directors to discuss. The problem is few of these people seem to have the want or assertion to actually make quick decisions. Pontification is the 'go to here' with Governance processes added that really seem to add another layer of unchallenging conversation, when really the elephant in the room is "given the sheer quantity of people being hired, why are there still so manyof the same urgent priorities taking months and years to be discussed and delivered?"
2. Tech composition - the way tech is structured is unlike anywhere i have worked before. Tech people are treated like Gods: given massive training budgets and Level up ability Vs all other roles. The way this division is treated has resulted in many abusing the system, delivering little and offering pitiful excuses that just would not be accepted time and time again. The velocity of tech is extremely low, they are not monitored or challenged anywhere near enough as recruitment in this area is challenging, and i feel those that are here can get away with blue murder. Again the construct does not help here, there are many roles within tech that seem to be duplications of effort and have been created to retain rather than for an absolute need in that area. I wish management would seriously review the construct of set teams and seriously consider building teams based on projects, allowing for fluidity of skill set and movement...rather than as it stands where you are forced to endure sometimes extremely poor attitudes and velocity outputs which when challenged are dismissed...why?...because tech rules that is why!!
3. No sense of urgency - honestly things move at a glacial pace here. If you enjoy stringing stuff out then it is wonderful and i argue is the reason why so many people stay but in all honesty there is no sense of pace here. Bonuses are not performance related which does not assist with motivation.
4. There is very limited knowledge as to company performance due to data access being difficult to easily access and analyse...Looker and Sherlock are not intuitive tools, indeed the labeling and subsets of data mean that you need people to review any dashboards you create before making any assumptions. I wish data was accessible in a more user friendly package i honestly feel it would allow those of us who want to understand the business, a much better chance of finding opportunities and access points.
5. Deep exploration and entrepreneurial discovery is not encouraged however much the business tries to state so in interviews. In reality, work is booked out for months and years against a massive roadmap which is ever growing with legacy and tech debt clean up work.
6. The Unique Selling Point of this business i.e. its flexibility has gone. More and more companies are now offering flexible hours and working from home as and when you want. If you asked me now what makes people stay, i would say the incredibly low work output requirements and complete lack of urgency. I think those who are career driven are hanging in here until the economy opens back up to make a move, although i have noticed a spike in people leaving this month post bonus which is unlike anything i have seen before. Maybe watching those that are ambitious leave could be the push the company needs to reassess?