Consider your options carefully. - Consultant Slalom Employee Review

2.0
Nov 1, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- The work/life balance is fair. - Experienced and considerate colleagues.

Cons

In reflecting on my time at Slalom I tried to come up with points as neutral and informative as possible. However, I once read a review here on Glassdoor that said something along the lines of “don’t leave a good position to come here” and I think that reflects my sentiment. While there is a good aspect or two, in time, if you prioritize your character projection based on your work product rather than social likability you will be disappointed with Slalom. There are some considerable organizational issues brought up in these reviews that are not easily addressed. It will take reflection and action by leadership to solve them. There will be many reviews that focus on pay, hours, time off, etc. - quantitative things. However, these are easy to control and I’ll let other reviewers focus on those. Slalom has trouble in the qualitative areas: politics, accountability, etc. - The culture and work environment is political. You must have very high competency in this area in order to succeed at Slalom. - Skills among staff are not inventoried or leveraged optimally. The lack of a skill inventory amplifies a social importance factor since likability and self-promotion are the few factors leadership has to use to match staff to projects if project-skill matching even occurs. - Middle-level leadership is lacking quality - When I think of an ideal leader, I think, “What can I do to be more like this person? What qualities do they have that I want? What could I learn from them?” There were few people that I worked for at Slalom where I was able to even approach these questions. - Accountability and responsibility across all levels was murky leading to ‘do now, think later’ half-completed, abandoned, or poorly considered initiatives. - Despite a formal process, timely feedback was rarely given by superiors. - Colleagues never seemed to like to work together to achieve for the betterment of the company, it felt more individualistic. - My experience with payroll and benefits was inconsistent and took too much time to solve errors. - The local model leads to redundant and/or fragmented operations between offices.

avatar
Slalom Response
8y
This is John Tobin. Very thoughtful review here. As you have been at Slalom for a little bit, I likely know you. If you want to talk more about any of this, send me an email at johnt@slalom.com and we can figure out a time to connect. I will share this post with the Dallas leadership team. I think you are spot on with our middle-level leadership and we can do a better job of cultivating people really throughout our careers. Our leadership programs are honestly great - when you are in them - but I see the opportunity to really make this more holistic and automatic, which I feel you are calling out. Some markets are better than others and this is a good reminder. If there's more that you'd like to share anonymously please consider doing so via this survey: http://slalom.ws/anonsurvey.

Explore other reviews about Slalom

5.0
May 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong local client base, collaborative team culture, good learning opportunities, and career growth.

Cons

Need to adjust quickly to different clients, tools, and expectations.

2.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

•There is an impressive budget, especially for high-level events, ancillary experiences, client giveaways, and premium swag. Management does not hesitate to fund top-notch brand experiences when needed. •The company offers a highly competitive benefits and perks package that remains a strong selling point.

Cons

•The "fiercely human" core value does not match daily operations. Collaboration is routinely replaced by a self-service model of training videos and help articles. •These recurring shifts are designed to manufacture the appearance of fiscal stability for the benefit of external stakeholders and clients, while leaving core operational deficits unaddressed. •Organizational maturity is low. Teams operate in deep silos, the internal tech stack is outdated, and there is a distinct lack of adequate project and event management software.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All