employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Smokey Point Behavioral Hospital

Engaged Employer

Beware, for profit hospital and management is horrible - Lead MHT Smokey Point Behavioral Hospital Employee Review

1.0
Aug 22, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Amazing co-workers (most of them), one free meal per shift

Cons

Management is horrible, they lie about everything and refuse to pay employees a living wage. They also pick favorites.

avatar
Smokey Point Behavioral Hospital Response
1y
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback. We are concerned to hear about your negative experience with management. Our goal is to create a supportive and positive work environment for all employees, and we take these matters seriously. To ensure employees feel supported, we have launched our "Culture of Care" program, designed to provide employees with a platform to share their concerns and collaborate on enhancing our workplace. We are committed to ensuring that our employees feel valued, supported, and heard; all employees are encouraged to participate. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss your concerns further in a confidential setting. Please feel free to reach out to us directly so we can address these issues together. Thank you for your dedication to our team.

Explore other reviews about Smokey Point Behavioral Hospital

5.0
Mar 7, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

SPBH has allowed me to grow my clinical skills and work with different populations. The director is super helpful

Cons

Requires evening hours at times

avatar
Smokey Point Behavioral Hospital Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your experience at SPBH! We're glad to hear that you've had opportunities to grow your clinical skills and work with diverse populations. It's great to know that leadership has been supportive as well. We appreciate your dedication and the work you do to support our patients!
1.0
Feb 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent insurance and free meal.

Cons

Intake operations often felt driven by census goals rather than realistic clinical capacity. There was strong pressure to complete admissions before midnight, but staffing did not match the volume being accepted. It was common for a single clinician to manage multiple evaluations. Walk-ins were not accounted for in scheduling, which frequently created bottlenecks. Patients sometimes waited extended periods before evaluation or placement. I frequently resorted to using yoga mats to create temporary resting areas due to limited space and resources. Obtaining medication orders from the on-call provider could be delayed, including for detoxing patients with active medical symptoms. While behavioral escalation that involved property damage tended to prompt faster responses, medical discomfort did not always receive the same urgency, which added stress for both patients and staff. Staff burnout was significant, and I witnessed new employees leave mid-shift due to the workload and lack of support. The overall structure of the intake process felt heavily volume-driven. There was clear emphasis on maximizing admissions, and at times this seemed to take priority over ensuring adequate staffing, medical oversight, and patient comfort. For those seeking a patient-first environment, I would encourage careful consideration and thorough questions during the interview process. Ask about night staffing, intake volume expectations, and leadership transparency before accepting a position.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All