employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Sploot Veterinary Care

Engaged Employer

Chaotic, unprofessional leadership, micromanagement, highway to burnout - Veterinarian Sploot Veterinary Care Employee Review

1.0
Apr 23, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

High pay and great recruitment tactics

Cons

Everything about my time with Sploot was chaotic Onboarding at corporate was well organized, but past the first 24 hours, the mismanagement was blatantly obvious. It took several months to get access to company benefits. I never worked with my medical director at a newly opened clinic. Doctors are micromanaged (to patients’ detriment) by people with no medical background or education. Everything about this place is unprofessional, meant to pump profits (shrouded in “patient care”), and actively avoids accountability for how medical staff is treated. Scheduling for doctors is ridiculously inconsistent and time off rules changed drastically.

Explore other reviews about Sploot Veterinary Care

5.0
Jul 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture Competitive pay Career advancement opportunity Nice mix of case load between emergency and general practice Overtime opportunity Amazing doctors and nurses

Cons

Pet benefits could be better

1.0
May 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The support staff and many of the doctors I worked with were genuinely kind, hardworking people who cared deeply about patient care. The clinics themselves are modern and aesthetically impressive.

Cons

In my experience, the operational model places heavy emphasis on maintaining a very fast-paced schedule and expecting doctors to become independently productive very quickly, often at the expense of sustainability and support. The onboarding process felt extremely accelerated (2 days) given the volume of operational systems, workflow expectations, pricing structures, and policies new doctors are expected to absorb while simultaneously managing a full appointment schedule. There was minimal protected administrative time built into the day, and multiple doctors openly discussed routinely finishing records, callbacks, and other responsibilities outside scheduled working hours. The culture also felt heavily dependent on constant self-advocacy in order to obtain basic workflow support or schedule adjustments rather than those protections being proactively built into the system. During my time there, frequent conversations among both doctors and support staff about people leaving the organization made turnover feel notably common and normalized within the workplace culture. Leadership was receptive in conversation, but many concerns ultimately felt reframed as individual adaptability issues rather than structural workflow concerns. While some accommodations were eventually discussed, it often felt reactive rather than preventative. This may be a good fit for doctors who thrive in a very fast-paced corporate environment with significant autonomy early on. For those looking for a more collaborative, sustainably paced culture with stronger built-in support and mentorship, this may not be the best fit.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All