Wonderful Company and Amazing Product, Vindictive and Incompetent Management - Business Development Representative (BDR) Splunk Employee Review

4.0
Jul 19, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Splunk as a company is one of the most accepting and cool places I’ve worked. Almost everyone loves working at Splunk, as I did myself. The benefits and pay are amazing, and the Splunk platform as a product is extremely versatile and cool in terms of how it can manipulate data. The technical folks are in general incredibly smart and willing to help, and most high level Sales RSM’s and RSD’d are well versed in the product, driven, willing to teach, and experts of their craft. A few of the BDR managers are experts at what they do, know how to lead and enable their team, and can push you forward through difficult quarters in healthy ways.

Cons

The sales orgs responsible for Small-Medium accounts are wildly incompetent. The BDR/ISR org rolls up under Marketing, and is aligned to the actual sales teams based on the whims and moods of the BDR/ISR leadership. While there are a select few managers of the BDR org that are experts at what they do, there are others who are wildly incompetent and vindictive. There is known conflict between the managers who have expertise and those who do not, despite their weak attempts at a united front to the BDR/ISR teams. The leadership of the AVP over the BDR/ISR is well-intentioned and progressive, but at times chaotic and too trusting of their subordinate senior managers who are good at maintaining a facade while being vindictive behind their backs. The AVP likely needs additional supporting roles to delegate the thousands of tasks that demand her attention. The training process as a BDR was confusing and lacked direction. This process was highly scrutinized during my tenure, and efforts were being made to improve the processes.

Explore other reviews about Splunk

5.0
Jul 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Excellent work life balance and competitive compensation. - Strong benefits and talented, supportive colleagues. - Industry leading technology with an established brand. - Opportunity to work with large enterprise customers and travel when needed.

Cons

- Since the Cisco acquisition, leadership quality and sales execution have noticeably declined. The culture has shifted from customer success to excessive focus on spreadsheets, dashboards, and internal metrics. - Internal politics and favoritism have become increasingly apparent, creating inconsistent opportunities across territories and reps. - The Splunk / Cisco integration remains fragmented. Sales motions, product positioning, and incentives are not aligned, making it difficult to execute effectively. - Cisco sellers are still not consistently incentivized to sell Splunk, creating unnecessary friction between teams. - Lack of experienced SE resources makes running successful PoCs difficult and slows sales cycles. - Account Executives are increasingly treated like overlays rather than owners of their business. - Product innovation has slowed, with a greater emphasis on packaging and licensing changes instead of meaningful platform improvements, while competitors like CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks continue to execute aggressively.

1
2.0
Feb 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Employment Healthcare Dental and vision 401(k) match Employee Stock Purchase Program

Cons

I was an employee of Splunk prior to its acquisition by Cisco. To say the two organizations run things completely different is to say it mildly. Micromanagement, passive aggressiveness, poor communication are just a few of the things that I still remember post acquisition. The level of micromanagement is counter productive and yields far less results than trying to imbed a sense of true ownership. Prior to acquisition Splunkers for the most part were valued as individuals. Post, it is more do it or else mentality. From interactions and observations, direct line managers are heavily stressed causing the ripple effect. Favorites or favoritism are in more abundance post acquisition resulting in increasing 90/10 rule. Promotions are more cutthroat post acquisition as Cisco actually thinks Splunkers coming over were paid too much. So they shuffled folks around, froze headcount that created more work for those still there, and reduced the promotion slots. SEs started jumping off the burning ship so I followed suit and am thankful I did. More and more it seemed like the Splunk folks were just surviving rather than thriving. I was honestly a bit sad when I left because I had so much fun working with Splunk prior to the acquisition. It was energetic, vibrant, and employees had loyalty to the brand. The work was challenging in a good way and people’s individual strengths were leveraged as opposed to having one cookie cutter mold for all.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All