Registered Nurse - Staff Nurse II - Registered Nurse - Staff Nurse II Sutter Health Employee Review

2.0
Mar 23, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good location for me as I live in San Francisco and its close to my residence. This is the reason I stay here.

Cons

As other RN's have said on here, CPMC pays RN's low compared to the other San Francisco hospitals. You can see what UCSF pays their clinical nurse II for example simply by googling "USCF medical center nurse pay and tier." They pay over 10% more overall (plus better benefits). Other CPMC employees may say the pay and benefits are good, and for them they probably are, but not for nurses. For us RN's, CPMC pays low for San Francisco and has probably the worst benefits: The pension plan is not very strong. They stopped matching on the 403b plan which is like a 401k. The health insurance we are given frankly sucks. You can only go to a Sutter affiliated doctor. To me these are all cons. CPMC use to pay well, had blue cross health insurance, matched on the 403b, and appreciated that nurses are the backbone of the hospital. Now we are treated like a robot and number, and not appreciated or compensated, and it reflects that feeling.

Explore other reviews about Sutter Health

5.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The top-notch professionalism work-culture is what made me decide to switch from a contract-worker to a full-time RN.

Cons

I wish that the N95 mask requirement was included while I was in Chicago in my remote physical and urine drug testing during pre-employment. I had to fly in SF for one day to meet the N95 fit requirement then fly back to Chicago to spend more time with family.

3.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leadership trainings, conferences, educational opportunities, Senior leadership seems to respond to employee feedback, Great organizational transparency and clarity around goals and direction, Front-line leadership receiving recognition more often, Fair (not amazing) compensation and benefits overall, Organization seems to be healthy and growing which is encouraging for job security and retention.

Cons

Unsustainable front-line leadership expectations, responsibilities, and tasks without providing support from supervisors or assistant managers specifically in San Francisco campuses, High burnout risk among front-line leaders which is continuing to increase, Growing list of contradicting or conflicting priorities. Patient experience scores have improved greatly in SF but patient quality/safety and employee satisfaction has become the apparent cost of that, Very unreasonable span of control for front-line leaders, i.e. way too many direct reports, Meeting metrics and KPIs at all costs is the message being received. Front-line leaders are left scrambling to reach the data points (regardless of the methods), to get there. In other words, we might be meeting the metrics and KPIs on paper, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the real purpose or reason behind those metrics is being performed. We’re just desperate to keep our jobs, The leadership culture in the last 6-9 months has shifted towards motivation through fear. Fear of losing our jobs or bonuses rather than motivation by providing actual daily support in doing our jobs and genuine concern and encouragement to succeed.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All