Sutter Health Information Services - Analyst Sutter Health Employee Review

3.0
Feb 11, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some of the people who work in the service level are hard working good people. They have a nice break room in one of the Mather sites?

Cons

The senior leadership staff at Sutter Health Information Services is horrible. There is no strategy, leadership cohesion or structure. Due to the lack of professional leadership, middle managers and staff are constantly stepping on each other to garner visibility or promote self importance. So far from company mission values/statements, unprofessional and borderline hostile work environment. Sadly much work is needed and will not get done efficiently because of poor management. The staff turn over is significant and is not addressed because human resource bears no importance. There are many key roles and most leadership roles that are occupied by people with little, no or not related experience. Roles are filled based by leadership favorites rather the right candidate for the role in an alarmingly blatant manner, truly discouraging.

avatar
Sutter Health Response
9y
Thank you for taking the time to write a review. What you describe is not representative of our company and its values. We are constantly striving to improve the employee experience at all levels of our organization, and to that end, although you state you have left our company, please feel free to reach out to me at talentacquisition@sutterhealth.org should you desire to discuss this further. Thank you.

Explore other reviews about Sutter Health

5.0
Jul 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice people and excellent care for their patients

Cons

Not really much to share

3.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leadership trainings, conferences, educational opportunities, Senior leadership seems to respond to employee feedback, Great organizational transparency and clarity around goals and direction, Front-line leadership receiving recognition more often, Fair (not amazing) compensation and benefits overall, Organization seems to be healthy and growing which is encouraging for job security and retention.

Cons

Unsustainable front-line leadership expectations, responsibilities, and tasks without providing support from supervisors or assistant managers specifically in San Francisco campuses, High burnout risk among front-line leaders which is continuing to increase, Growing list of contradicting or conflicting priorities. Patient experience scores have improved greatly in SF but patient quality/safety and employee satisfaction has become the apparent cost of that, Very unreasonable span of control for front-line leaders, i.e. way too many direct reports, Meeting metrics and KPIs at all costs is the message being received. Front-line leaders are left scrambling to reach the data points (regardless of the methods), to get there. In other words, we might be meeting the metrics and KPIs on paper, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the real purpose or reason behind those metrics is being performed. We’re just desperate to keep our jobs, The leadership culture in the last 6-9 months has shifted towards motivation through fear. Fear of losing our jobs or bonuses rather than motivation by providing actual daily support in doing our jobs and genuine concern and encouragement to succeed.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All