abandon ship - Radiologic Technologist Sutter Health Employee Review

1.0
Jun 2, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great teamwork with my fellow co workers, we really look out for each other.

Cons

Management just doesn't seem to care. Way understaffed, overworked, work flow impossible, lots of my co workers working double shifts just to get staffing level to skeleton crew status. Senior management just doesn't get it, they take away more and more perks from us every year, and are now forcing us to park 3 blocks away, which is all fine and good, unless you work the PM shift and are off at 1130 at night and have to walk 3 blocks by yourself in not the best neighborhood. Benefits sound great on paper, but my "Sutter " medical insurance denied my hospital stay because of a improper coding error by the sutter doctor's office . now they say I owe $55,000 for a procedure i needed. And that's how they treat their patients? Everything is about write ups, if you make someone mad you will get written up. Bad system. Everything boils down to the $$$. that's all they seem to care about. Yes, I understand it's a business, and businesses are there to make money, but as an employee, i don't want it drilled into my head on whether or not our department made budget, and now i have to "flex out" so they can make their bottom line. (that's a dirty little secret they don't want you to know about)

Explore other reviews about Sutter Health

5.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The top-notch professionalism work-culture is what made me decide to switch from a contract-worker to a full-time RN.

Cons

I wish that the N95 mask requirement was included while I was in Chicago in my remote physical and urine drug testing during pre-employment. I had to fly in SF for one day to meet the N95 fit requirement then fly back to Chicago to spend more time with family.

3.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leadership trainings, conferences, educational opportunities, Senior leadership seems to respond to employee feedback, Great organizational transparency and clarity around goals and direction, Front-line leadership receiving recognition more often, Fair (not amazing) compensation and benefits overall, Organization seems to be healthy and growing which is encouraging for job security and retention.

Cons

Unsustainable front-line leadership expectations, responsibilities, and tasks without providing support from supervisors or assistant managers specifically in San Francisco campuses, High burnout risk among front-line leaders which is continuing to increase, Growing list of contradicting or conflicting priorities. Patient experience scores have improved greatly in SF but patient quality/safety and employee satisfaction has become the apparent cost of that, Very unreasonable span of control for front-line leaders, i.e. way too many direct reports, Meeting metrics and KPIs at all costs is the message being received. Front-line leaders are left scrambling to reach the data points (regardless of the methods), to get there. In other words, we might be meeting the metrics and KPIs on paper, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the real purpose or reason behind those metrics is being performed. We’re just desperate to keep our jobs, The leadership culture in the last 6-9 months has shifted towards motivation through fear. Fear of losing our jobs or bonuses rather than motivation by providing actual daily support in doing our jobs and genuine concern and encouragement to succeed.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All