Great Company But Slipping - Diagnostic Sonographer Swedish Employee Review

3.0
May 19, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive pay, promote and support employee advancement. The downtown facilities offer a very diverse patient population, exposure to a wide variety of pathologies/conditions, level 3 medical facility means more exposure to complicated cases, and a fast paced environment. All these things mean a great amount of experience in a relatively small amount of time when compared with outlying facilities within other healthcare systems or even Swedish itself.

Cons

Swedish has expanded too quickly, pouring an excess amount of money into new facilities and takeovers. The former has caused cannibalization of its own market with respect to downtown facilities. The latter has caused Swedish to hemorrhage money out of the three new facilities with the end result being significant cuts to staff, benefits, and prospective wages across all campuses. If you seek stability in the short term, this is not the place to take a job/career as the financial turmoil has yet to equalize. The focus has turned to the bottom line rather than effective and safe patient care. All of these changes have begun within the last 2 years.

Explore other reviews about Swedish

5.0
Jul 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company offered great flexibility- great manager

Cons

The floor I worked on was understaffed

1.0
Apr 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

+The company is severely incompetent +Trauma-bonding with your co-workers will never be easier

Cons

-Toxic management culture: you'll frequently be brought into full-team meetings where the management will circle-jerk themselves, refuse to listen to team members, change random procedures, then ask why the workers want to unionize. -The company is SEVERELY incompetent: the company blows thousands of dollars on worthless things like their own in-house AI chatbot GPT clone and refuses to spend money on resources wisely while simultaneously complaining about the budget. -Abhorrently dishonest: They let me go after bringing me into a meeting to discuss "communication expectations." They then refused to allow two-party consent for recording, fired me for apparently "violating their standards of protocol", refused to allow me to stay to gather any evidence of their random firing, and refused to respond to any emails to confirm the nature of the meeting. This was ALSO the week before the management promised everyone on our team an annual raise. -Separation is a nightmare: Not only did they lie about the reason for separation before being busted by the state, but they also refuse to cash out PTO time, and HR is a nightmare to work with when confirming details for state services.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All